儒家文化与公司风险承担

被引:150
作者
金智 [1 ]
徐慧 [2 ]
马永强 [1 ]
机构
[1] 西南财经大学会计学院
[2] 云南财经大学会计学院
关键词
儒家文化; 公司风险承担; 非正式制度CEO; 文化特征;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B222 [儒家]; F272.3 [经营决策];
学科分类号
010102 ; 1201 ;
摘要
本文以2001-2013年中国上市公司为研究对象,考察儒家传统对公司风险承担的影响,结果发现:公司所处地区的市场环境、外来文化及产权属性都会影响儒家文化对公司风险承担的作用。整体而言,公司受儒家文化影响越大,风险承担水平越低。这种相关关系在市场化程度高、对外开放程度高的地区以及民营公司中相对较弱。而且,使用CEO出生地区孔庙数量代理儒家文化进行回归,同样支持儒家文化与公司风险承担负相关的结论。此外,我们还发现儒家文化通过降低公司风险承担,进而降低了公司的市场回报。本文拓展了我们对非正式制度在公司财务中作用的认识,也丰富了"文化与金融"的相关理论。
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 192
页数:23
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Corporate governance and risk-taking [J].
John, Kose ;
Litov, Lubomir ;
Yeung, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (04) :1679-1728
[32]  
Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance[J] . Amir N. Licht,Chanan Goldschmidt,Shalom H. Schwartz.Journal of Comparative Economics . 2007 (4)
[33]  
Executive Stock Options: Early Exercise Provisions and Risk‐taking Incentives[J] . NEIL BRISLEY.The Journal of Finance . 2006 (5)
[34]  
Law, finance, and economic growth in China[J] . Franklin Allen,Jun Qian,Meijun Qian.Journal of Financial Economics . 2005 (1)
[35]  
Governing Stock Markets in Transition Economies: Lessons from China[J] . Katharina Pistor.American Law and Economics Review . 2005
[36]  
Managerial incentives and risk-taking[J] . Jeffrey L. Coles,Naveen D. Daniel,Lalitha Naveen.Journal of Financial Economics . 2005 (2)
[37]  
Firm‐level Disclosures and the Relative Roles of Culture and Legal Origin[J] . Ole‐KristianHope.Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting . 2003 (3)
[38]  
Culture, openness, and finance[J] . René M. Stulz,Rohan Williamson.Journal of Financial Economics . 2003 (3)
[39]   Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking [J].
Rajgopal, S ;
Shevlin, T .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (02) :145-171
[40]  
The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead[J] . Oliver E. Williamson.Journal of Economic Literature . 2000 (3)