Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation

被引:155
作者
Macdonald, John R. [1 ]
Zobel, Christopher W. [2 ]
Melnyk, Steven A. [3 ]
Griffis, Stanley E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Business Informat Technol, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
supply chain risk; supply chain disruption; resilience; theory-building; discrete-event simulation; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; DISRUPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; GLITCHES; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The research literature of supply chain risk and resilience is at a critical developmental stage. Studies have established the importance of these topics both to researchers and practitioners. They also have identified factors contributing to risk, the impact of risk and disruptions on performance, and the strategies and tactics used to build the capacity for supply chain resilience. Although these efforts can provide support for constructing a theory of risk and resilience, researchers are currently restricted in their ability to build such a theory by the difficulty of collecting the necessary data. This paper contributes to this literature development effort by summarising prior research reviews and developing a three-component framework aimed at helping researchers to build better theories. This is accomplished through combining structured experimental design with discrete-event simulations of supply chains. The result is a methodology that allows researchers to develop better understanding of the factors that link a disruption to its impact on supply chain performance through both direct and interaction effects. Following the methodology development, the paper concludes with an example using the factors of shock interarrival time, supply chain connectivity and buffer stocks to illustrate the potential for contributing to the theory-building process.
引用
收藏
页码:4337 / 4355
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[11]   TOWARD A SYSTEM FOR CLASSIFYING BUSINESS STRATEGIES [J].
CHRISMAN, JJ ;
HOFER, CW ;
BOULTON, WR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1988, 13 (03) :413-428
[12]  
Christopher Martin., 2004, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V15, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09574090410700275, 10.1108/09574090410700275]
[13]   Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review [J].
Colicchia, Claudia ;
Strozzi, Fernanda .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (04) :403-418
[14]   A model for supply management of agile manufacturing supply chains [J].
Costantino, Nicola ;
Dotoli, Mariagrazia ;
Falagario, Marco ;
Fanti, Maria Pia ;
Mangini, Agostino Marcello .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 135 (01) :451-457
[15]   The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities [J].
Craighead, Christopher W. ;
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny ;
Handfield, Robert B. .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2007, 38 (01) :131-156
[16]   Order Stability in Supply Chains: Coordination Risk and the Role of Coordination Stock [J].
Croson, Rachel ;
Donohue, Karen ;
Katok, Elena ;
Sterman, John .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 23 (02) :176-196
[17]  
Davis JP, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P480, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351453
[18]  
Dr Punter A., 2013, Supply Chain Failures
[19]  
Falasca M., 2008, Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, (May 2008), P596
[20]  
Fiksel J, 2015, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V56, P79