The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities

被引:1042
作者
Craighead, Christopher W.
Blackhurst, Jennifer
Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny
Handfield, Robert B.
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Management, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Coll Business, Logist Operat & MIS Dept, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Coll Management, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
RISK; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Supply chain disruptions and the associated operational and financial risks represent the most pressing concern facing firms that compete in today's global marketplace. Extant research has not only confirmed the costly nature of supply chain disruptions but has also contributed relevant insights on such related issues as supply chain risks, vulnerability, resilience, and continuity. In this conceptual note, we focus on a relatively unexplored issue, asking and answering the question of how and why one supply chain disruption would be more severe than another. In doing so, we argue, de facto, that supply chain disruptions are unavoidable and, as a consequence, that all supply chains are inherently risky. Employing a multiple-method, multiple-source empirical research design, we derive novel insights, presented as six propositions that relate the severity of supply chain disruptions (i) to the three supply chain design characteristics of density, complexity, and node criticality and (ii) to the two supply chain mitigation capabilities of recovery and warning. These findings not only augment existing knowledge related to supply chain risk, vulnerability, resilience, and business continuity planning but also call into question the wisdom of pursuing such practices as supply base reduction, global sourcing, and sourcing from supply clusters.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 156
页数:26
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Risk and uncertainty in managing chemical manufacturing supply chains [J].
Applequist, GE ;
Pekny, JF ;
Reklaitis, GV .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 24 (9-10) :2211-2222
[2]  
Buhman C, 2005, PROD OPER MANAG, V14, P493, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00236.x
[3]  
Cavinato J. L., 2004, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, V34, P383, DOI 10.1108/09600030410545427
[4]   The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation [J].
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Krause, Daniel R. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 24 (05) :637-652
[5]  
Chopra S, 2004, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V46, P53
[6]   PERCEPT PERCEPT INFLATION IN MICROORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH - AN INVESTIGATION OF PREVALENCE AND EFFECT [J].
CRAMPTON, SM ;
WAGNER, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (01) :67-76
[7]   Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? [J].
Doty, D. Harold ;
Glick, William H. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (04) :374-406
[8]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550
[9]  
Fine CharlesH., 1998, CLOCKSPEED WINNING I
[10]   THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE [J].
FLANAGAN, JC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1954, 51 (04) :327-358