The neglect of prescreening information

被引:46
作者
Chakravarti, Amitav [1 ]
Janiszewski, Chris
Ulkumen, Gulden
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.43.4.642
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Several studies show that information used to screen alternatives becomes less important than information acquired later in the search process simply because it was used to screen. Experiment 1 shows that the tendency to deemphasize prescreening information leads to systematically different choices for decision makers who screen alternatives compared with decision makers who do not screen alternatives. Additional studies show that screening encourages decision makers to shift their emphasis from prescreening information to postscreening information (Experiment 2). Prescreening information is deemphasized because of the categorization that occurs when people create a consideration set of retained alternatives (Experiments 3 and 4). Together, the results show that a brand's strength of consideration (i.e., how highly an option ranks on screening criteria) may have little influence on the likelihood of it being chosen in a postscreening choice process.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 653
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces [J].
Alba, J ;
Lynch, J ;
Weitz, B ;
Janiszewski, C ;
Lutz, R ;
Sawyer, A ;
Wood, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (03) :38-53
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
[3]   BROADENING THE DEFINITION OF DECISION-MAKING - THE ROLE OF PRECHOICE SCREENING OF OPTIONS [J].
BEACH, LR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (04) :215-220
[4]  
Bettman J., 1979, INFORM PROCESSING TH
[5]   EFFECTS OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AND PHASE OF THE CHOICE PROCESS ON CONSUMER DECISION-PROCESSES - A PROTOCOL ANALYSIS [J].
BETTMAN, JR ;
PARK, CW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1980, 7 (03) :234-248
[6]   MEASURES OF COMPENSATORY AND NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS OF DECISION BEHAVIOR - PROCESS TRACING VERSUS POLICY CAPTURING [J].
BILLINGS, RS ;
MARCUS, SA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1983, 31 (03) :331-352
[7]   MASTERING THE MIX - DO ADVERTISING, PROMOTION, AND SALES FORCE ACTIVITIES LEAD TO DIFFERENTIATION [J].
BOULDING, W ;
LEE, EY ;
STAELIN, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (02) :159-172
[8]   INDUSTRIAL BUYERS CHOICE STRATEGIES - A PROTOCOL ANALYSIS [J].
CROW, LE ;
OLSHAVSKY, RW ;
SUMMERS, JO .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1980, 17 (01) :34-44
[9]   Consumer preference for a no-choice option [J].
Dhar, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (02) :215-231
[10]   Smart agents: When lower search costs for quality information increase price sensitivity [J].
Diehl, K ;
Kornish, LJ ;
Lynch, JG .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (01) :56-71