Societal trust and open innovation

被引:165
作者
Brockman, Paul [1 ]
Khurana, Inder K. [2 ]
Zhong, Rong [3 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Coll Business & Econ, PereIla Dept Finance, Lehigh, PA USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Trulaske Coll Business, Sch Accountancy, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Liautaud Grad Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Societal trust; Social capital; Open innovation; Innovative efficiency; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; STOCK-MARKET; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; EXTERNAL SOURCES; HIGH-TECH; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.010
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
While open innovation provides a new paradigm to sustain a firm's competitive advantage, opening up to external knowledge also entails substantial risks of appropriation and opportunism. Building on this "open paradox" framework, this study investigates whether societal trust-a key aspect of informal cultural norms-serves as an effective mechanism in improving relational governance among partners, thereby leading to better collaborative outcomes. Using a novel panel data on co-owned patents across 29 countries, we show that firms in high trust countries are able to produce a higher level of joint output (i.e., co-owned patents). This effect is more pronounced when perceived opportunism is higher (i.e., firms in high-tech industries, or in countries with less disclosure transparency), and when formal contracts are less enforceable (i.e., in countries with relatively weak legal systems). We further show that open innovation is the channel through which societal trust promotes innovative efficiency. Overall, our study establishes societal trust as a key factor in influencing the efficiency of open innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:2048 / 2065
页数:18
相关论文
共 102 条
[11]   Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health [J].
Barth, ME ;
Beaver, WH ;
Landsman, WR .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1998, 25 (01) :1-34
[12]   Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Lokshin, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1477-1492
[13]   Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners [J].
Belderbos, Rene ;
Cassiman, Bruno ;
Faems, Dries ;
Leten, Bart ;
Van Looy, Bart .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (05) :841-852
[14]   Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework [J].
Bhagat, RS ;
Kedia, BL ;
Harveston, PD ;
Triandis, HC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (02) :204-221
[15]   Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms [J].
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Van Reenen, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1999, 66 (03) :529-554
[16]  
Bogers M, 2010, USER CUMULATIVE INNO
[17]   Trust, risk and betrayal [J].
Bohnet, I ;
Zeckhauser, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2004, 55 (04) :467-484
[18]   Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data [J].
Brouwer, E ;
Kleinknecht, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1999, 28 (06) :615-624
[19]   Law, Stock Markets, and Innovation [J].
Brown, James R. ;
Martinsson, Gustav ;
Petersen, Bruce C. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (04) :1517-1549
[20]   The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures [J].
Chan, LKC ;
Lakonishok, J ;
Sougiannis, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (06) :2431-2456