Societal trust and open innovation

被引:165
作者
Brockman, Paul [1 ]
Khurana, Inder K. [2 ]
Zhong, Rong [3 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Coll Business & Econ, PereIla Dept Finance, Lehigh, PA USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Trulaske Coll Business, Sch Accountancy, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Liautaud Grad Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Societal trust; Social capital; Open innovation; Innovative efficiency; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; STOCK-MARKET; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; EXTERNAL SOURCES; HIGH-TECH; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.010
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
While open innovation provides a new paradigm to sustain a firm's competitive advantage, opening up to external knowledge also entails substantial risks of appropriation and opportunism. Building on this "open paradox" framework, this study investigates whether societal trust-a key aspect of informal cultural norms-serves as an effective mechanism in improving relational governance among partners, thereby leading to better collaborative outcomes. Using a novel panel data on co-owned patents across 29 countries, we show that firms in high trust countries are able to produce a higher level of joint output (i.e., co-owned patents). This effect is more pronounced when perceived opportunism is higher (i.e., firms in high-tech industries, or in countries with less disclosure transparency), and when formal contracts are less enforceable (i.e., in countries with relatively weak legal systems). We further show that open innovation is the channel through which societal trust promotes innovative efficiency. Overall, our study establishes societal trust as a key factor in influencing the efficiency of open innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:2048 / 2065
页数:18
相关论文
共 102 条
[91]  
Schwartz SH, 1994, Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values
[92]   Culture, openness, and finance [J].
Stulz, RM ;
Williamson, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 70 (03) :313-349
[93]   Who co-operates for innovation, and why - An empirical analysis [J].
Tether, BS .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (06) :947-967
[94]  
Vanhaverbeke W., 2006, Open innovation: researching a new paradigm, P258, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2008.00502.X
[95]  
Walsh J.P., 2016, Research Policy
[96]   Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software [J].
West, Joel ;
Gallagher, Scott .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (03) :319-331
[97]   Open innovation: The next decade Introduction [J].
West, Joel ;
Salter, Ammon ;
Vanhaverbeke, Wim ;
Chesbrough, Henry .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (05) :805-811
[98]   CALCULATIVENESS, TRUST, AND ECONOMIC-ORGANIZATION [J].
WILLIAMSON, OE .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1993, 36 (01) :453-486
[99]  
Williamson OliverE., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capital
[100]  
Williamson QE, 2000, J ECON LIT, V38, P595