反倾销对中国出口的抑制效应探究

被引:66
作者
王孝松 [1 ]
翟光宇 [2 ]
林发勤 [3 ]
机构
[1] 中国人民大学经济学院
[2] 东北财经大学金融学院
[3] 中央财经大学国际经济与贸易学院
关键词
对华反倾销; 抑制效应; 引力模型; “贸易缺口”;
D O I
10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2015.05.004
中图分类号
F752.02 [贸易保护]; F752.62 [出口贸易];
学科分类号
020206 ;
摘要
通过在国际贸易引力模型中加入反倾销因素,本文定量考察贸易壁垒对中国出口带来的影响。使用1992至2010年中国同24个贸易伙伴分行业的三维混合数据进行分析,本文发现贸易伙伴对中国商品实施的反倾销措施显著抑制了中国商品的出口。反事实模拟结果表明,反倾销使中国的出口额减少2到3.2个百分点,而发达国家反倾销的抑制效应明显高于平均水平。反倾销带来的"贸易缺口"还具有显著的行业差异,并且在一些年份给中国相关行业出口造成较大的负面影响。中国各界应高度重视国外的反倾销措施,积极应对,探寻解决方案,努力降低反倾销给出口贸易造成的不利影响。
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 58
页数:23
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]  
Trade Policy Flexibilities and Turkey: Tariffs, Anti‐dumping, Safeguards and WTO Dispute Settlement[J] . Chad P. Bown.World Econ . 2014 (2)
[12]  
The Heterogeneous Effects of Trade Protection: A Study of US Antidumping Duties on Portland Cement[J] . Maya Cohen-Meidan.Review of Industrial Organization . 2013 (4)
[13]  
Under the Cover of Antidumping: Does Administered Protection Facilitate Domestic Collusion?[J] . Kara M. Reynolds.Review of Industrial Organization . 2013 (4)
[14]  
The Trade Impact of Indian Antidumping Measures against China: Evidence from Monthly Data[J] . Hylke Vandenbussche,Christian Viegelahn.Foreign Trade Review . 2013 (1)
[15]  
New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?[J] . Costas Arkolakis,Arnaud Costinot,Andrés Rodríguez-clare.The American Economic Review . 2012 (1)
[16]   Heterogeneous responses of firms to trade protection [J].
Konings, Jozef ;
Vandenbussche, Hylke .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 76 (02) :371-383
[17]   The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade [J].
Disdier, Anne-Celia ;
Head, Keith .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (01) :37-48
[18]  
Trade deflection and trade depression[J] . Chad P. Bown,Meredith A. Crowley.Journal of International Economics . 2006 (1)
[19]  
Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle[J] . James E. Anderson,Eric van Wincoop.The American Economic Review . 2003 (1)
[20]   Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy [J].
Jozef Konings ;
Hylke Vandenbussche ;
Linda Springael .
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2001, 1 (3) :283-299