COMPARISON OF SPIRAL-ACQUISITION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF PULMONARY METASTATIC DISEASE

In a prospective study, spiral-acquisition computed tomography (SACT) of the thorax was evaluated in 104 patients with extrathoracic malignancy and suspected pulmonary metastases, and was directly compared with conventional computed tomography (CCT) in 23 patients. The following parameters were assessed: lesion detectability; the effect on lesion detectability of reconstruction of scans at 5 mm and 10 mm slice increments; breathing artefact and slice misregistration. The radiation dose of the two techniques was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters placed within an anthropomorphic chest phantom, and the visibility of simulated metastases inserted into the phantom was also compared using CCT, standard SACT and SACT with pitch greater than 1.0. Where metastases were present, SACT scans showed significantly better lesion detectability than CCT scans (p < 0.001). Image reconstruction of SACT data at 5 mm increments conferred no significant advantage in lesion detectability over 10 mm increment reconstructions. Compared with CCT, SACT scans showed reduced breathing artefact, and a complete absence of slice misregistration (p < 0.01). Phantom measurements of radiation dose and resolution were similar for both techniques. Increasing the pitch of the spiral in SACT caused only a small decrease in phantom resolution, but with the advantage of a reduction in the radiation dose. Spiral-acquisition CT is superior to conventional CT for the assessment of pulmonary metastatic disease.