Congressional Use of the Program Assessment Rating Tool

被引：42

作者：

Frisco, Velda ^{[1
]}

Stalebrink, Odd ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 316 Woodburn Hall,POB 6317, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA

[2] Penn State Univ Harrisburg, Sch Publ Affairs, W160 Olmstead Bldg,777 W Harrisburg Pike, Middletown, PA 17057 USA

来源：

PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE | 2008年 / 28卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1540-5850.2008.00902.x

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

This paper seeks to advance knowledge about congressional use of the program assessment rating tool (PART) in the 109th Congress. The research suggest that both congressional chambers use PART on a limited basis; affirms that congressional committees are exposed to PART scores through congressional budget justification score inclusion and in federal agency testimony; and that use was primarily driven by non-congressional actors.

引用

页码：1 / 19

页数：19

共 28 条

[11]

Government Printing Office, C COMM MAT ONL

[12]

Government Printing Office, C HEAR

[13]

Gruber Amelia, GOVT EXECUTIVE

[14]

Johnson III Clay, TESTIMONY SENATE HOM

[15]

Moynihan DP, 2006, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V16, P151, DOI 10.1093/jopart/muj003

[16]

Norcross Eileen, AN OFF MAN BUYDG PRO

[17]

Office of Management and Budget, 2005, GUID COMPL PROGR RAT

[18]

Office of Management and Budget, WHATS NEW

[19]

Office of Management and Budget, 2005, A11 OFF MAN BUDG

[20]

Office of Management and Budget, US

← 1 2 3 →