Congressional Use of the Program Assessment Rating Tool

被引：42

作者：

Frisco, Velda ^{[1
]}

Stalebrink, Odd ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 316 Woodburn Hall,POB 6317, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA

[2] Penn State Univ Harrisburg, Sch Publ Affairs, W160 Olmstead Bldg,777 W Harrisburg Pike, Middletown, PA 17057 USA

来源：

PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE | 2008年 / 28卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1540-5850.2008.00902.x

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

This paper seeks to advance knowledge about congressional use of the program assessment rating tool (PART) in the 109th Congress. The research suggest that both congressional chambers use PART on a limited basis; affirms that congressional committees are exposed to PART scores through congressional budget justification score inclusion and in federal agency testimony; and that use was primarily driven by non-congressional actors.

引用

页码：1 / 19

页数：19

共 28 条

[1]

Adamson, 2006, ANAL OFFICE MANAGEME

[2]

Clinton T., 2004, BUSH ADM PROGR ASS R

[3]

Daniels Mitchell E., PROGRAM ASSESSMENT R, P1

[4] Why PART? The institutional politics of presidential budget reform [J].

Dull, M .

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2006, 16 (02) :187-215

[5]

Executive Office of the President, 2007, MAJ SAV REF PRES 200, P6

[6]

General Accounting Office, 2004, GAO04802

[7]

Gilmour, 2006, PUBLIC BUDGETING FIN, V26, P79

[8] Assessing performance budgeting at OMB: The influence of politics, performance, and program size [J].

Gilmour, JB ;

Lewis, DE .

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2006, 16 (02) :169-186

[9] Does performance budgeting work? An examination of the Office of Management and Budget's PART scores [J].

Gilmour, John B. ;

Lewis, David E. .

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (05) :742-752

[10]

Government Accountability Office, 2005, GAO0628, P42

← 1 2 3 →