MAGNITUDE AND CAUSES OF MORTALITY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MARRIED AND UNMARRIED MEN

被引:174
作者
BENSHLOMO, Y [1 ]
SMITH, GD [1 ]
SHIPLEY, M [1 ]
MARMOT, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON LONDON SCH HYG & TROP MED, DEPT EPIDEMIOL & POPULAT SCI, LONDON WC1E 7HT, ENGLAND
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.47.3.200
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Study objective-To determine the effect of marital status on mortality for men. In particular, to examine whether subgroups of unmarried men (widowed, single, and divorced/separated men) have a similar mortality to married men. Design-Cohort study Setting-Whitehall civil service, London, between 1967 and 1969 Participants-A total of 18 403 men aged 40-64 years with 18 years' follow up. Measurements and main results-Cause-specific mortality rates and risk factors at baseline were determined. Overall mortality was greater for all groups of unmarried men. Patterns of mortality were different in the subgroups of unmarried men. Widowed men had a significantly greater risk of dying from ischaemic heart disease (relative risk (RR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08, 1.97) which persisted after exclusion of deaths that occurred in the first two years. Divorced men had greater cancer mortality (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1-06, 2.10) that could not be explained simply by their greater consumption of cigarettes. The initial increased mortality for single men was no longer evident after adjustment for other risk factors, suggesting that single status in itself may not increase the risk. The risk for single men may have been underestimated, however, by over adjustment for possible intermediary factors. Conclusions-Previous studies, which have examined total mortality only or have grouped all unmarried men, have masked interesting differences in the cause of death between subgroups of unmarried men. The extent to which the findings are explicable by psychosocial factors or the role of other environmental factors, which may also differ in relation to marital status, is unclear. Future work should not assume that all unmarried men have similar mortality risks and must examine the life course of each subgroup to advance our understanding of the possible causal role of marital status in disease aetiology.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 205
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]  
Farr W., 1859, INFLUENCE MARRIAGE M
[12]   REVIEW - PROSTATE-CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY [J].
FLANDERS, WD .
PROSTATE, 1984, 5 (06) :621-629
[13]   TOWARDS A PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL MODEL OF CANCER - PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
GREER, S ;
WATSON, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1985, 20 (08) :773-777
[14]  
HAMMOND E. CUYLER, 1966, NAT CANCER INST MONOGR, V19, P127
[15]   CAUSES OF DEATH IN A WIDOWED POPULATION [J].
HELSING, KJ ;
COMSTOCK, GW ;
SZKLO, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 116 (03) :524-532
[16]   FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH MORTALITY AFTER WIDOWHOOD [J].
HELSING, KJ ;
SZKLO, M ;
COMSTOCK, GW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1981, 71 (08) :802-809
[17]   THE ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND ACTIVITIES WITH MORTALITY - PROSPECTIVE EVIDENCE FROM THE TECUMSEH COMMUNITY-HEALTH STUDY [J].
HOUSE, JS ;
ROBBINS, C ;
METZNER, HL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 116 (01) :123-140
[18]   MORTALITY DIFFERENTIALS BY MARITAL-STATUS - AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON [J].
HU, YR ;
GOLDMAN, N .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1990, 27 (02) :233-250
[20]   BEREAVEMENT AND CANCER - SOME DATA ON DEATHS OF SPOUSES FROM THE LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF OFFICE-OF-POPULATION-CENSUSES-AND-SURVEYS [J].
JONES, DR ;
GOLDBLATT, PO ;
LEON, DA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6443) :461-464