ANTECEDENTS OF THE ATTRACTION EFFECT - AN INFORMATION-PROCESSING APPROACH

被引:133
作者
MISHRA, S [1 ]
UMESH, UN [1 ]
STEM, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] WASHINGTON STATE UNIV,DEPT MKT,PULLMAN,WA 99164
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3172885
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many researchers have demonstrated the existence of an attraction effect that increases the choice probability of an existing ''target'' brand by the introduction of a relatively inferior ''decoy'' brand. This study develops a causal model that links antecedent variables with the attraction effect, We find that the attraction effect is explained to a considerable extent by changes in the following seven variables: (1) information relevance or stimulus meaningfulness, (2) product class knowledge, (3) task involvement, (4) perceived similarity between decoy and target, (5) relative brand preference, (6) share captured by decoy brand, and (7) perceived decoy popularity. The overall results were consistent across product classes studied, which included beer, cars, and TV sets. The popularity explanation for attraction effect, alluded to by Huber, Payne, and Puto (1982), was tested and found to hold true.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 349
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[2]   OPINIONS AND SOCIAL PRESSURE [J].
ASCH, SE .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1955, 193 (05) :31-35
[3]   THEORY OF STOCHASTIC PREFERENCE AND BRAND SWITCHING [J].
BASS, FM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1974, 11 (01) :1-20
[4]  
Bentler P. M., 1989, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[5]   CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BETTMAN, JR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 37 :257-289
[6]  
Bishop Y, 1975, DISCRETE MULTIVARIAT
[7]  
Bollen K.A., 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[8]   CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY [J].
COHEN, JB ;
CHAKRAVARTI, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 41 :243-288
[9]  
COHEN JV, 1977, STATISTICAL POWER AN
[10]  
DICK A, 1992, J CONSUM RES, V17, P82