An examination of procedural justice principles in China and the U.S.

被引：17

作者：

Jasmine Tata

Ping Ping Fu

Rongxian Wu

机构：

[1] Management Department, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611

[2] Department of Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories

[3] Psychology Department, Suzhou University

来源：

Asia Pacific Journal of Management | 2003年 / 20卷 / 2期

关键词：

Culture; Fairness; Procedural justice;

D O I：

10.1023/A:1023892416311

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper examines procedural justice principles from a cultural perspective, and examines the relationships between three dimensions of national culture (uncertainty avoidance, societal emphasis on collectivism, and gender egalitarianism), three principles of procedural justice (consistency, social sensitivity, and account-giving), and judgments of fairness. The results suggest that culture can influence employees' perceptions of the fairness of procedural justice principles; different dimensions of national culture influence different principles of procedural justice. The principle of social sensitivity was perceived as fairer in collectivistic China than in individualistic U.S. In addition, differences between men and women in perceived fairness of account-giving were exaggerated in China (a culture low in gender egalitarianism) and attenuated in the U.S. (a culture high in gender egalitarianism). © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

引用

页码：205 / 216

页数：11

共 35 条

[21]

Leung K., Lind E.A., Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 1134-1140, (1986)

[22]

Leventhal G.S., Karuza J., Fry W.R., Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences, Justice and Social Interaction, pp. 167-218, (1980)

[23]

Lind E.A., Tyler T.R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, (1988)

[24]

Lind E.A., Tyler T.R., Huo Y.J., Procedural Context and Culture: Variation in the Antecedents of Procedural Justice Judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, pp. 767-780, (1997)

[25]

Markoczy L., Measuring Beliefs: Accept no Substitutes, Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 1228-1242, (1997)

[26]

Moorman R.H., Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, pp. 845-855, (1991)

[27]

Ralston D.A., Gustafson D.J., Terpstra R.H., Holt D.H., Pre-Post Tiananmen Square: Changing Values of Chinese Managers, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 12, pp. 1-20, (1995)

[28]

Schonbach P., Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict, (1990)

[29]

Tata J., Implicit Theories of Account-Giving: Influence of Culture and Gender, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, pp. 437-454, (2000)

[30]

Tata J., Bowes-Sperry L., Emphasis on Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice: Differential Perceptions of Men and Women, Psychological Reports, (1996)

← 1 2 3 4 →