An examination of procedural justice principles in China and the U.S.

被引：17

作者：

Jasmine Tata

Ping Ping Fu

Rongxian Wu

机构：

[1] Management Department, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611

[2] Department of Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories

[3] Psychology Department, Suzhou University

来源：

Asia Pacific Journal of Management | 2003年 / 20卷 / 2期

关键词：

Culture; Fairness; Procedural justice;

D O I：

10.1023/A:1023892416311

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper examines procedural justice principles from a cultural perspective, and examines the relationships between three dimensions of national culture (uncertainty avoidance, societal emphasis on collectivism, and gender egalitarianism), three principles of procedural justice (consistency, social sensitivity, and account-giving), and judgments of fairness. The results suggest that culture can influence employees' perceptions of the fairness of procedural justice principles; different dimensions of national culture influence different principles of procedural justice. The principle of social sensitivity was perceived as fairer in collectivistic China than in individualistic U.S. In addition, differences between men and women in perceived fairness of account-giving were exaggerated in China (a culture low in gender egalitarianism) and attenuated in the U.S. (a culture high in gender egalitarianism). © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

引用

页码：205 / 216

页数：11

共 35 条

[1]

Baron R.M., Kenny D.A., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp. 1173-1182, (1986)

[2]

Benjamin R.W., Images of Conflict Resolution and Social Control: American and Japanese Attitudes Toward the Adversarial System, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19, pp. 123-137, (1975)

[3]

Beugre C.D., Managing Fairness in Organizations, (1998)

[4]

Bies R.J., Moag J.S., Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness, Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, pp. 43-55, (1986)

[5]

Birnbaum-More P.H., Wong G.Y.Y., Acquisition of Managerial Values in the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, pp. 255-275, (1995)

[6]

Bond M.H., Leung K., Schwartz S., Explaining Choices in Procedural and Distributive Justice Across Cultures, International Journal of Psychology, 27, pp. 211-225, (1992)

[7]

Brockner J., Ackerman G., Greenberg J., Gelfand M.J., Francesco A.M., Chen Z.X., Leung K., Bierbrauer G., Gomez G., Kirkman B.L., Shapiro D., Culture and Procedural Justice: The Influence of Power Distance on Reactions to Voice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, pp. 300-315, (2001)

[8]

Brown P., Levinson S.C., Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, (1987)

[9]

Chia R.C., Moore J.L., Lam K.N., Chuang C.J., Chen B.S., Cultural Differences in Gender Role Attitudes Between Chinese and American Students, Sex Roles, 33, pp. 23-30, (1994)

[10]

Chiu C., Tsang S., Yang C., The Role of Face Situation and Attitudinal Antecedents in Consumer Compliant Behavior, Journal of Social Psychology, 128, pp. 173-180, (1988)

← 1 2 3 4 →