How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial

被引:3710
作者
Balduzzi, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Ruecker, Gerta [1 ,2 ]
Schwarzer, Guido [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Med Biometry & Stat, Fac Med, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
MISSING OUTCOME DATA; PUBLICATION BIAS;
D O I
10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective Meta-analysis is of fundamental importance to obtain an unbiased assessment of the available evidence. In general, the use of meta-analysis has been increasing over the last three decades with mental health as a major research topic. It is then essential to well understand its methodology and interpret its results. In this publication, we describe how to perform a meta-analysis with the freely available statistical software environment R, using a working example taken from the field of mental health. Methods R package meta is used to conduct standard meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses for missing binary outcome data and potential selection bias are conducted with R package metasens. All essential R commands are provided and clearly described to conduct and report analyses. Results The working example considers a binary outcome: we show how to conduct a fixed effect and random effects meta-analysis and subgroup analysis, produce a forest and funnel plot and to test and adjust for funnel plot asymmetry. All these steps work similar for other outcome types. Conclusions R represents a powerful and flexible tool to conduct meta-analyses. This publication gives a brief glimpse into the topic and provides directions to more advanced meta-analysis methods available in R.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial [J].
Assink, Mark ;
Wibbelink, Carlijn J. M. .
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 12 (03) :154-174
[2]  
Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386
[3]   A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with Stata [J].
Chaimani, Anna ;
Mavridis, Dimitris ;
Salanti, Georgia .
EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 17 (04) :111-116
[4]   A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews [J].
Copas, JB ;
Shi, JQ .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (04) :251-265
[5]  
Cribari-Neto F, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V34, P1
[6]   Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis [J].
Davey, Jonathan ;
Turner, Rebecca M. ;
Clarke, Mike J. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[7]  
Deeks J.J., 2019, Cochrane Handbook Syst. Rev, P241, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781119536604, 10.1002/9780470712184.ch9, DOI 10.1002/9780470712184.CH9]
[8]   A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) :89-98
[9]   Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis [J].
Gamble, C ;
Hollis, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (06) :579-588
[10]   A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (20) :3443-3457