A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with Stata

被引:91
作者
Chaimani, Anna [1 ]
Mavridis, Dimitris [1 ,2 ]
Salanti, Georgia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Ioannina, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Dept Primary Educ, Ioannina, Greece
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/eb-2014-101967
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Statistical synthesis of research findings via meta-analysis is widely used to assess the relative effectiveness of competing interventions. A series of three papers aimed at familiarising mental health scientists with the key statistical concepts and problems in meta-analysis was recently published in this journal. One paper focused on the selection and interpretation of the appropriate model to synthesise results (fixed effect or random effects model) whereas the other two papers focused on two major threats that compromise the validity of meta-analysis results, namely publication bias and missing outcome data. In this paper we provide guidance on how to undertake meta-analysis using Stata, one of the most commonly used software packages for meta-analysis. We address the three topics covered in the previous issues of the journal, focusing on their implementation in Stata using a working example from mental health research.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 116
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[2]   A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].
Borenstein, Michael ;
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) :97-111
[3]   Advancing evidence-based practice to improve patient care [J].
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Furukawa, Toshi A. .
EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 17 (01) :1-2
[4]   THE EXISTENCE OF PUBLICATION BIAS AND RISK-FACTORS FOR ITS OCCURRENCE [J].
DICKERSIN, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10) :1385-1389
[5]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[6]   Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis [J].
Gamble, C ;
Hollis, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (06) :579-588
[7]   A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (20) :3443-3457
[8]   Updated tests for small-study effects in meta-analyses [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Harris, Ross J. ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) :197-210
[9]   metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis [J].
Harris, Ross J. ;
Bradburn, Michael J. ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :3-28
[10]   Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials [J].
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
White, Ian R. ;
Wood, Angela M. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (03) :225-239