Valuation of ecological resources and functions

被引:36
作者
Scott, MJ
Bilyard, GR
Link, SO
Ulibarri, CA
Westerdahl, HE
Ricci, PF
Seely, HE
机构
[1] Pacific NW Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[2] Univ San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
natural resource economics; ecological economics; ecological resources; shrub-steppe; environmental valuation; cost; benefit; value;
D O I
10.1007/s002679900083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological resources are natural resources that provide certain necessary but overlooked system maintenance functions within ecosystems, Environmental economics is in search of an appropriate analysis framework to determine economic values of such resources. This paper presents a framework that estimates and compiles the components of value fora natural ecosystem. The framework begins with the ecological processes involved, which provide functions within the ecosystem and services valued by humans. We discuss the additive or competive nature of these values, and estimate these values through conventional and unconventional techniques. We apply the framework to ecological resources in a shrub-steppe dryland habitat being displaced by development. We first determine which functions and services are mutually exclusive (e.g., farming vs soil stabilization) and which are complementary or products of joint production (e.g., soil stabilization and maintenance of species). We then apply benefit transfer principles with contingent valuation methodology (CVM), travel cost methodology (TCM), and hedonic damage pricing (HDP). Finally, we derive upper-limit values for more difficult-to-value functions through the use of human analogs, which we argue are the most appropriate method of valuation under some circumstances. The highest values of natural shrub-steppe habitat appear to be derived from soil stabilization.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 68
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]   THE ISSUE OF SCOPE IN CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES [J].
CARSON, RT ;
MITCHELL, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 75 (05) :1263-1267
[12]  
Clawson M., 1966, Economics of Outdoor Recreation
[13]  
Constanza R., 1989, ECOLOGICAL EC, V1, P335
[14]   AVERTING EXPENDITURE AND THE COST OF POLLUTION [J].
COURANT, PN ;
PORTER, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1981, 8 (04) :321-329
[15]  
CROPPER ML, 1992, J ECON LIT, V30, P675
[16]  
CUMMINGS R, 1981, METHODS DEV ENV CONT, V5
[17]   CONTINGENT VALUATION - IS SOME NUMBER BETTER THAN NO NUMBER [J].
DIAMOND, PA ;
HAUSMAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :45-64
[18]  
Freeman A.Myrick., 1993, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[19]  
FREEMAN AM, 1992, VALUING NATURAL ASSE
[20]  
GUPTA TR, 1975, AM J AGR EC FEB, P40