Valuation of ecological resources and functions

被引:36
作者
Scott, MJ
Bilyard, GR
Link, SO
Ulibarri, CA
Westerdahl, HE
Ricci, PF
Seely, HE
机构
[1] Pacific NW Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[2] Univ San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
natural resource economics; ecological economics; ecological resources; shrub-steppe; environmental valuation; cost; benefit; value;
D O I
10.1007/s002679900083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological resources are natural resources that provide certain necessary but overlooked system maintenance functions within ecosystems, Environmental economics is in search of an appropriate analysis framework to determine economic values of such resources. This paper presents a framework that estimates and compiles the components of value fora natural ecosystem. The framework begins with the ecological processes involved, which provide functions within the ecosystem and services valued by humans. We discuss the additive or competive nature of these values, and estimate these values through conventional and unconventional techniques. We apply the framework to ecological resources in a shrub-steppe dryland habitat being displaced by development. We first determine which functions and services are mutually exclusive (e.g., farming vs soil stabilization) and which are complementary or products of joint production (e.g., soil stabilization and maintenance of species). We then apply benefit transfer principles with contingent valuation methodology (CVM), travel cost methodology (TCM), and hedonic damage pricing (HDP). Finally, we derive upper-limit values for more difficult-to-value functions through the use of human analogs, which we argue are the most appropriate method of valuation under some circumstances. The highest values of natural shrub-steppe habitat appear to be derived from soil stabilization.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 68
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   USER FEES AND EQUITY ISSUES IN PUBLIC HUNTING EXPENDITURES - THE CASE OF RING-NECKED PHEASANT IN OREGON [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
BERGLAND, O ;
MUSSER, WN ;
JOHNSON, SL ;
MUSSER, LM .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1989, 65 (04) :376-385
[2]  
[Anonymous], FEDERAL REGISTER
[3]  
[Anonymous], TOXICS LAW REPORTER
[4]   VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONS - TROPICAL WETLANDS [J].
BARBIER, EB .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1994, 70 (02) :155-173
[6]  
BATIE SS, 1985, LAND ECON, V60, P1
[7]   EXISTENCE VALUES IN BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS AND DAMAGE ASSESSMENT [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
WELSH, MP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1992, 68 (04) :405-417
[8]   BENEFIT TRANSFER STUDIES - MYTHS, PRAGMATISM, AND IDEALISM [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
BERGSTROM, JC .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (03) :657-663
[9]   BENEFIT TRANSFERS - CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES [J].
BROOKSHIRE, DS ;
NEILL, HR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (03) :651-655
[10]  
*CAMBR EC INC, 1992, S P WASH DC APR 1992