Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation

被引:155
作者
Macdonald, John R. [1 ]
Zobel, Christopher W. [2 ]
Melnyk, Steven A. [3 ]
Griffis, Stanley E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Business Informat Technol, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
supply chain risk; supply chain disruption; resilience; theory-building; discrete-event simulation; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; DISRUPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; GLITCHES; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The research literature of supply chain risk and resilience is at a critical developmental stage. Studies have established the importance of these topics both to researchers and practitioners. They also have identified factors contributing to risk, the impact of risk and disruptions on performance, and the strategies and tactics used to build the capacity for supply chain resilience. Although these efforts can provide support for constructing a theory of risk and resilience, researchers are currently restricted in their ability to build such a theory by the difficulty of collecting the necessary data. This paper contributes to this literature development effort by summarising prior research reviews and developing a three-component framework aimed at helping researchers to build better theories. This is accomplished through combining structured experimental design with discrete-event simulations of supply chains. The result is a methodology that allows researchers to develop better understanding of the factors that link a disruption to its impact on supply chain performance through both direct and interaction effects. Following the methodology development, the paper concludes with an example using the factors of shock interarrival time, supply chain connectivity and buffer stocks to illustrate the potential for contributing to the theory-building process.
引用
收藏
页码:4337 / 4355
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination [J].
Ambulkar, Saurabh ;
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Grawe, Scott .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33-34 :111-122
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM
[3]   An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions [J].
Blackhurst, J ;
Craighead, CW ;
Elkins, D ;
Handfield, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (19) :4067-4081
[4]   An Empirically Derived Framework of Global Supply Resiliency [J].
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Dunn, Kaitlin S. ;
Craighead, Christopher W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2011, 32 (04) :374-391
[5]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[6]   Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities [J].
Bruneau, Michel ;
Reinhorn, Andrei .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2007, 23 (01) :41-62
[7]   Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation [J].
Carvalho, Helena ;
Barroso, Ana P. ;
Machado, Virginia H. ;
Azevedo, Susana ;
Cruz-Machado, V. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 62 (01) :329-341
[8]   Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities [J].
Chang, SE ;
Shinozuka, M .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (03) :739-755
[9]   An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility [J].
Chiang, Chung-Yean ;
Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Canan ;
Suresh, Nallan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (1-2) :49-78
[10]   The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation [J].
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Krause, Daniel R. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 24 (05) :637-652