Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stoke in patients with non-valvular artial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks

被引:170
作者
Aguilar, M., I [1 ]
Hart, R. [1 ]
Pearce, L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Neurol, Div Cerebrovasc Dis, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2007年 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD006186.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Non- valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) carries an increased risk of stroke mediated by embolism of stasis-precipitated thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage. Both oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents have proven effective for stroke prevention in most patients at high risk for vascular events, but primary stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF potentially merits separate consideration because of the suspected cardio-embolic mechanism of most strokes in AF patients. Objectives To characterize the relative effect of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment compared with antiplatelet therapy on major vascular events in patients with non-valvular AF and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register ( June 2006). We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) ( The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE ( 1966 to June 2006) and EMBASE ( 1980 to June 2006). We contacted the Atrial Fibrillation Collaboration and experts working in the field to identify unpublished and ongoing trials. Selection criteria All unconfounded, randomized trials in which long-term ( more than four weeks) adjusted-dose oral anticoagulant treatment was compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic non-valvular AF. Data collection analysis Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed quality and extracted data. The Peto method was used for combining odds ratios after assessing for heterogeneity. Main results Eight randomized trials, including 9598 patients, tested adjusted-dose warfarin versus aspirin (in dosages ranging from 75 to 325 mg/day) in AF patients without prior stroke or TIA. The mean overall follow up was 1.9 years/participant. Oral anticoagulants were associated with lower risk of all stroke (odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.85), ischemic stroke ( OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.68) and systemic emboli ( OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90). All disabling or fatal strokes (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01) were substantially but not significantly reduced by oral anticoagulants. Vascular death (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15) and all cause mortality ( OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.18), were similar with these treatments. Intracranial hemorrhages (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.28) were increased by oral anticoagulant therapy. Authros's conslusions Adjusted-dose warfarin and related oral anticoagulants reduce stroke, disabling stroke and other major vascular events for those with non-valvular AF by about one third when compared with antiplatelet therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Optimal INR for prevention of stroke and death in atrial fibrillation:: a critical appraisal [J].
Odén, A ;
Fahlén, M ;
Hart, RG .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2006, 117 (05) :493-499
[22]   Comparative effects of antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or combined therapy in patients with valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation -: A randomized multicenter study [J].
Pérez-Gómez, F ;
Alegría, E ;
Berjón, J ;
Iriarte, JA ;
Zumalde, J ;
Salvador, A ;
Mataix, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (08) :1557-1566
[23]  
PETERSEN P, 1989, LANCET, V1, P175
[24]   Low-dose aspirin for prevention of stroke in low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation - Japan atrial fibrillation stroke trial [J].
Sato, H ;
Ishikawa, K ;
Kitabatake, A ;
Ogawa, S ;
Maruyama, Y ;
Yokota, Y ;
Fukuyama, T ;
Doi, Y ;
Mochizuki, S ;
Izumi, T ;
Takekoshi, N ;
Yoshida, K ;
Hiramori, K ;
Origasa, H ;
Uchiyama, S ;
Matsumoto, M ;
Yamaguchi, T ;
Hori, M .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (02) :447-451
[25]  
SAZENA R, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, P187, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000187.PUB2
[26]   Systematic review of long term anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation [J].
Taylor, FC ;
Cohen, H ;
Ebrahim, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7282) :321-326
[27]   Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation - An individual patient meta-analysis [J].
van Walraven, C ;
Hart, RG ;
Singer, DE ;
Laupacis, A ;
Connolly, S ;
Petersen, P ;
Koudstaal, PJ ;
Chang, YC ;
Hellemons, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (19) :2441-2448
[28]  
VEMMOS KN, 2005, EUROPEAN J INT MED, V17, P48
[29]   A risk score for predicting stroke or death in individuals with new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community - The Framingham Heart Study [J].
Wang, TJ ;
Massaro, JM ;
Levy, D ;
Vasan, RS ;
Wolf, PA ;
D'Agostino, RB ;
Larson, MG ;
Kannel, WB ;
Benjamin, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (08) :1049-1056
[30]   ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR STROKE - THE FRAMINGHAM-STUDY [J].
WOLF, PA ;
ABBOTT, RD ;
KANNEL, WB .
STROKE, 1991, 22 (08) :983-988