Imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: the multi-agent case

被引:23
作者
Bester, H [1 ]
Strausz, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Econ, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
revelation principle; mechanism design; limited commitment; asymmetric information;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00301-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider mechanism design problems with n agents when the mechanism designer cannot fully commit to an allocation function. With a single agent (n = 1) optimal mechanisms can always be represented by direct mechanisms, under which each agent's message set is the set of his possible types [Bester, H., Strausz, R., 2000. Contracting with imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: the single agent case. Free University of Berlin, mimeo]. We show that this result does not hold if n greater than or equal to 2. That is, in mechanism design problems with multiple agents the use of direct mechanisms may be suboptimal. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
BESTER H, 2000, UNPUB CONTRACTING IN
[2]   IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL CHOICE RULES - SOME GENERAL RESULTS ON INCENTIVE COMPATIBILITY [J].
DASGUPTA, P ;
HAMMOND, P ;
MASKIN, E .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1979, 46 (02) :185-216
[3]   MANIPULATION OF VOTING SCHEMES - GENERAL RESULT [J].
GIBBARD, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (04) :587-601
[4]   CHARACTERIZATION OF SATISFACTORY MECHANISMS FOR REVELATION OF PREFERENCES FOR PUBLIC-GOODS [J].
GREEN, J ;
LAFFONT, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1977, 45 (02) :427-438
[5]   CONTRACT RENEGOTIATION AND COASIAN DYNAMICS [J].
HART, OD ;
TIROLE, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1988, 55 (04) :509-540
[6]  
LAFFONT JJ, 1990, REV ECON STUD, V57, P579
[7]   INCENTIVE COMPATIBILITY AND THE BARGAINING PROBLEM [J].
MYERSON, RB .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :61-73