How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields

被引:301
作者
Talke, Katrin [1 ]
Salomo, Soren [2 ]
Rost, Katja [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Inst Entrepreneurship & Innovat, D-20354 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Execut Sch Business, DK-2800 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Zurich, IOU Inst Org & Adm Sci, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Theory of upper echelon; TMT diversity; Innovation strategy; Corporate governance; New product portfolio innovativeness; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT-PROJECTS; HIGH-VELOCITY ENVIRONMENTS; MARKET ORIENTATION; DECISION-PROCESSES; GENDER DIVERSITY; SUCCESS FACTORS; UPPER ECHELONS; TECHNOLOGY; FIRMS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Past innovation research has largely neglected potential effects of corporate governance issues on strategic choices, and thereby on innovation management outcomes. The theory of upper echelon implies that strategic choices result from idiosyncrasies of top management teams (TMT). Building on this theory, we hypothesize that TMT diversity enhances firm performance by facilitating an innovation strategy that increases the firm's new product portfolio innovativeness. Our findings support the relevance of considering a corporate governance view for explaining innovation outcomes. Empirically, we can show that TMT diversity has a strong impact on the strategic choice of firms to focus on innovation fields. Such focus then drives new product portfolio innovativeness and firm performance. As corporate governance arrangements thus seem relevant in the context of innovation management, we can derive implications for both policy makers and innovation researchers. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 918
页数:12
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   From science to technology to products and profits - Superconductivity at General Electric and Intermagnetics General (1960-1990) [J].
Abetti, PA .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2002, 17 (01) :83-98
[2]  
Adler P.S., 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17
[3]   MEASURES OF INEQUALITY [J].
ALLISON, PD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (06) :865-880
[4]   DEMOGRAPHY AND DESIGN - PREDICTORS OF NEW PRODUCT TEAM PERFORMANCE [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :321-341
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG
[7]  
Axelrod R., 1976, Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
[8]   TOP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATIONS IN BANKING - DOES THE COMPOSITION OF THE TOP TEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE [J].
BANTEL, KA ;
JACKSON, SE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 10 :107-124
[9]   STRATEGIC CLARITY IN BANKING - ROLE OF TOP MANAGEMENT-TEAM DEMOGRAPHY [J].
BANTEL, KA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1993, 73 (03) :1187-1201