Limitations and risks of machine ethics

被引:61
作者
Brundage, Miles [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Consortium Sci Policy & Outcomes, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
machine ethics; risk; artificial general intelligence;
D O I
10.1080/0952813X.2014.895108
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many authors have proposed constraining the behaviour of intelligent systems with 'machine ethics' to ensure positive social outcomes from the development of such systems. This paper critically analyses the prospects for machine ethics, identifying several inherent limitations. While machine ethics may increase the probability of ethical behaviour in some situations, it cannot guarantee it due to the nature of ethics, the computational limitations of computational agents and the complexity of the world. In addition, machine ethics, even if it were to be 'solved' at a technical level, would be insufficient to ensure positive social outcomes from intelligent systems.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 372
页数:18
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]  
Gert Bernard., 2007, Common Morality: Deciding What to Do
[32]   Moral Satisficing: Rethinking Moral Behavior as Bounded Rationality [J].
Gigerenzer, Gerd .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2010, 2 (03) :528-554
[33]  
Gomila A, 2009, HDB RES SYNTHETIC EM, P166
[34]   There is no "I" in "Robot": Robots and utilitarianism [J].
Grau, Christopher .
IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (04) :52-55
[35]  
Guarini M., 2011, Machine Ethics, P316
[36]  
Haidt J., 2012, RIGHTEOUS MIND WHY G
[37]  
Hanson R., 2001, J ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
[38]  
Helbing D., 2010, Systemic Risks in Society and Economics
[39]   What Does the Frame Problem Tell us About Moral Normativity? [J].
Horgan, Terry ;
Timmons, Mark .
ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE, 2009, 12 (01) :25-51
[40]  
Human Rights Watch, 2012, Losing Humanity, The Case Against Killer Robots