The German Energiewende - History and status quo

被引:120
作者
Hake, Juergen-Friedrich [1 ]
Fischer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Venghaus, Sandra [1 ]
Weckenbrock, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res, Dept Syst Anal & Technol Evaluat IEK STE, D-52425 Julich, Germany
关键词
Energy transition; Energy policy; Energy security; Nuclear power; Renewables; Germany; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; PATH-DEPENDENCE; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLICY; DISCOURSES; PROMOTION; ECONOMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.027
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Industrialized nations rely heavily on fossil fuels as an economic factor. Energy systems therefore play a special part in realizing visions of future sustainable societies. In Germany, successive governments have specified their ideas on sustainable development and the related energy system. Detailed objectives make the vision of the Energiewettde the transformation of the energy sector more concrete. Many Germans hope that the country sets a positive example for other nations whose energy systems also heavily rely on fossil fuels. A glance at the historical dimensions of this transformation shows that the origins of German energy objectives lie more than thirty years in the past. The realization of these goals has not been free from tensions and conflicts. This article aims at explaining Germany's pioneering role in the promotion of an energy system largely built on renewable energy sources by disclosing the drivers that have successively led to the Energiewende. To reveal these drivers, the historical emergence of energy politics in Germany was analyzed especially with respect to path dependencies and discourses (and their underlying power relations) as well as exogenous events that have enabled significant shifts in the political energy strategy of Germany. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 546
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
[71]   Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics [J].
Pierson, P .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2000, 94 (02) :251-267
[72]  
Rat der EU, 2007, SCHLUSSF VORS
[73]   Discourses of rurality in EU spatial policy: The European spatial development perspective [J].
Richardson, T .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2000, 40 (01) :53-+
[74]  
Roose J., 2010, Umweltund Technikkonflikte, P79, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-92354-3_4
[75]  
Rosenthal U., 1997, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V7, P277, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024349
[76]  
Schlor Holger, 2012, International Journal of Sustainable Society, V4, P317, DOI 10.1504/IJSSOC.2012.049404
[77]  
Schumacher E. F., 1973, Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered.
[78]  
Schumann D., 2012, ENERGIEWIRTSCHAFT, V62, P29
[79]  
Sewell W., 1996, 3 TEMPORALITIES EVEN
[80]   The portfolio of renewable energy sources for achieving the three E policy goals [J].
Shen, Yung-Chi ;
Chou, Chiyang James ;
Lin, Grace T. R. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) :2589-2598