Cohesion and Performance A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams

被引:154
作者
Chiocchio, Francois [1 ]
Essiembre, Helene [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, IO Psychol Program, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
cohesion; performance; project teams; production teams; service teams; GROUP COHESIVENESS; TASK-PERFORMANCE; COLLECTIVE EFFICACY; WORK GROUPS; MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION; IMPACT; LEVEL; CONSEQUENCES; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1177/1046496409335103
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The management of project teams is evolving from managing technical processes to focusing on psychosocial determinants of performance. This trend puts a strain on project management theory and practice. Past meta-analyses on the cohesion-performance relationship show a positive correlation. However, they integrate effect sizes across different types of teams and settings. To clarify this issue for project teams, this meta-analysis differentiates 33 cohesion-performance correlations depending on whether teams are project, production, or service teams in organizational or academic settings. Results show that types of teams and settings are moderators. Project teams in organizational and academic settings show large effect sizes and differ from other teams. Theoretical considerations point to five interrelated modifiers: task uncertainty, task versus outcome performance, student samples' mental representation of the project outcome, and group heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 420
页数:39
相关论文
共 139 条
[11]  
Borman W.C., 1993, Personnel selection in organizations, P71, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7472
[12]   Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research [J].
Borman, WC ;
Motowidlo, SJ .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1997, 10 (02) :99-109
[13]   When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - A meta-analysis [J].
Bowers, CA ;
Pharmer, JA ;
Salas, E .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (03) :305-327
[14]   EXPLORING THE PLANNING FALLACY - WHY PEOPLE UNDERESTIMATE THEIR TASK COMPLETION TIMES [J].
BUEHLER, R ;
GRIFFIN, D ;
ROSS, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (03) :366-381
[15]   The measurement of cohesion in work teams [J].
Carless, SA ;
De Paola, C .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (01) :71-88
[16]   Cohesion - Conceptual and measurement issues [J].
Carron, AV ;
Brawley, LR .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (01) :89-106
[17]   Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis [J].
Carron, AV ;
Colman, MM ;
Wheeler, J ;
Stevens, D .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 24 (02) :168-188
[18]  
CASEYCAMPBELL MR, 2005, THESIS CONCORDIA U M
[19]  
Chiocchio F., 2007, PROJ MANAG J, V38, P97, DOI [10.1177/8756972807038001, DOI 10.1177/8756972807038001]
[20]  
CHIOCCHIO F, J COMPUTER IN PRESS