Innovation mechanisms in German precision farming

被引:69
作者
Busse, M. [1 ]
Doernberg, A. [1 ]
Siebert, R. [1 ]
Kuntosch, A. [2 ]
Schwerdtner, W. [3 ]
Koenig, B. [2 ]
Bokelmann, W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF eV, Inst Socioecon, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agr Econ, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] AURELIUS Forsch & Beratung, D-12159 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Innovation processes; Sectoral innovation system; Expert interviews; Delphi survey; Farmers; ADOPTION; AGRICULTURE; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-013-9337-2
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In the precision farming (PF) literature on innovation activities, it becomes apparent that only individual aspects of the entire PF innovation process chain are considered, namely, the knowledge transfer and the adoption of PF applications. Therefore, this study seeks to analyze the innovation mechanisms in the entire PF innovation process chain. The paper identifies potentials, barriers and challenges for PF innovations in Germany and the respective agricultural subsector plant production. An in-depth understanding of innovation mechanisms is required to enhance innovation capabilities, overcome obstacles and bring further innovations to the agricultural field. A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods was applied-including interviews, an expert workshop and a Delphi survey-to explore innovation mechanisms and the role of heterogeneous actors. The research is based on the analytical framework of the sectoral innovation system approach. Key results are the identification of barriers in the later stages of the innovation processes (including validation, serial production and adoption), a gap in the knowledge transfer between science and practice, insufficient communication and co-operation between actors and the important influence of political and legal conditions. Furthermore, this study showed that farmers play an important role in the generation of innovations. For example, farmers are not only adopters or demanders but also impulse providers or co-developers. In conclusion, this study moves the PF innovation debate forward not only by providing adoption facts but also by presenting explanations for the complex interactions between actors throughout the innovation process chain.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 426
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
European Commission, 2012, Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Innovation for a sustainable future-the eco-innovation action plan (Eco-AP)
[12]   Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt [J].
S. Fountas ;
S. Blackmore ;
D. Ess ;
S. Hawkins ;
G. Blumhoff ;
J. Lowenberg-Deboer ;
C. G. Sorensen .
Precision Agriculture, 2005, 6 (2) :121-141
[13]  
Gulbrandsen M., 2009, CONFLUENCE INTERDISC, P55
[14]  
Gunnesch-Luca G., 2010, MARKT, V49, P53, DOI [10.1007/s12642-010-0026-7, DOI 10.1007/S12642-010-0026-7]
[15]  
Hader M., 2014, DELPHI BEFRAGUNGEN A, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-01928-0
[16]  
Hatfield J.L., 2000, Precision Agriculture and Environmental Quality: Challenges for Research and Education
[17]   A variable-rate decision support tool [J].
Havlin, J. L. ;
Heiniger, R. W. .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2009, 10 (04) :356-369
[18]  
Hayami Y., 1971, AGR DEV INT PERSPECT
[19]   Seeing is believing: The role of field days and tours in precision agriculture education [J].
Heiniger R.W. ;
Havlin J.L. ;
Crouse D.A. ;
Kvien C. ;
Knowles T. .
Precision Agriculture, 2002, 3 (4) :309-318
[20]   Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change [J].
Hekkert, M. P. ;
Suurs, R. A. A. ;
Negro, S. O. ;
Kuhlmann, S. ;
Smits, R. E. H. M. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (04) :413-432