Vertical territorial restrictions and public policy: Theories and industry evidence

被引:59
作者
Dutta, S [1 ]
Heide, JB
Bergen, M
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Business, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1251978
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Territorial restrictions long have been the subject of intense policy debate. The central issue in this debate has been whether such distribution arrangements are deployed for efficiency or anticompetitive purposes. The authors add to the debate by broadening the existing conceptualization of business efficiency and providing evidence of the importance of efficiency considerations in the decision to deploy restrictions. In the past, efficiency often has been viewed narrowly, in terms of giving distributors incentives to provide free-rideable services. The authors show that information asymmetry and transaction costs also represent important efficiency-based explanations of territorial restrictions. With regard to anticompetitive concerns, their results show that manufacturers are more likely to use territorial restrictions when they face competition ex ante. Ultimately, this may reduce interbrand competition. From a public policy perspective, their pattern of results supports the current rule of reason treatment of territorial restrictions in the United States. At the same time it questions the current European policy of per se illegality.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 134
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces [J].
Alba, J ;
Lynch, J ;
Weitz, B ;
Janiszewski, C ;
Lutz, R ;
Sawyer, A ;
Wood, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (03) :38-53
[2]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[3]   THE USE OF PLEDGES TO BUILD AND SUSTAIN COMMITMENT IN DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (01) :18-34
[4]  
ANDERSON E, 1987, J MARKETING, V51, P71
[5]  
Anderson E., 1985, MARKET SCI, V4, P234, DOI [10.1287/mksc.4.3.234, DOI 10.1287/MKSC.4.3.234]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1978, ANTITRUST PARADOX PO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MANAGING BUSINESS T
[8]  
AREEDA P, 1986, ANTITRUST ANAL PROBL
[9]  
ASPINWALL LV, 1962, MANAGERIAL MARKETING, P633
[10]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1982, 2 GENERATION MULTIVA, V1, P24