Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study

被引:2619
作者
Ahmed, Hashim U. [1 ,2 ]
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Louise C. [4 ]
Gabe, Rhian [5 ,6 ]
Kaplan, Richard [4 ]
Parmar, Mahesh K. [4 ]
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda [4 ]
Ward, Katie [4 ]
Hindley, Richard G. [7 ]
Freeman, Alex [8 ]
Kirkham, Alex P. [9 ]
Oldroyd, Robert
Parker, Chris [3 ]
Emberton, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Fac Med Sci, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[2] UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Acad Urol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[4] UCL, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[5] Univ York, Hull York Med Sch, York, N Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York, N Yorkshire, England
[7] Hampshire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[8] UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Histopathol, London, England
[9] UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
TUMOR VOLUME; PREDICTIVE VALUES; MAPPING BIOPSIES; TRANSPERINEAL; TESTS; PERFORMANCE; TRIAL; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Men with high serum prostate specific antigen usually undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy). TRUS-biopsy can cause side-effects including bleeding, pain, and infection. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) used as a triage test might allow men to avoid unnecessary TRUS-biopsy and improve diagnostic accuracy. Methods We did this multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study to test diagnostic accuracy of MP-MRI and TRUS-biopsy against a reference test (template prostate mapping biopsy [TPM-biopsy]). Men with prostate-specific antigen concentrations up to 15 ng/mL, with no previous biopsy, underwent 1.5 Tesla MP-MRI followed by both TRUS-biopsy and TPM-biopsy. The conduct and reporting of each test was done blind to other test results. Clinically significant cancer was defined as Gleason score >= 4 + 3 or a maximum cancer core length 6 mm or longer. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01292291. Findings Between May 17, 2012, and November 9, 2015, we enrolled 740 men, 576 of whom underwent 1.5 Tesla MP-MRI followed by both TRUS-biopsy and TPM-biopsy. On TPM-biopsy, 408 (71%) of 576 men had cancer with 230 (40%) of 576 patients clinically significant. For clinically signifi cant cancer, MP-MRI was more sensitive (93%, 95% CI 88-96%) than TRUS-biopsy (48%, 42-55%; p<0.0001) and less specific (41%, 36-46% for MP-MRI vs 96%, 94-98% for TRUS-biopsy; p<0.0001). 44 (5.9%) of 740 patients reported serious adverse events, including 8 cases of sepsis. Interpretation Using MP-MRI to triage men might allow 27% of patients avoid a primary biopsy and diagnosis of 5% fewer clinically insignificant cancers. If subsequent TRUS-biopsies were directed by MP-MRI findings, up to 18% more cases of clinically signifi cant cancer might be detected compared with the standard pathway of TRUS-biopsy for all. MP-MRI, used as a triage test before first prostate biopsy, could reduce unnecessary biopsies by a quarter. MP-MRI can also reduce over-diagnosis of clinically insignifi cant prostate cancer and improve detection of clinically signifi cant cancer. Funding PROMIS is funded by the UK Government Department of Health, National Institute of Health Research-Health Technology Assessment Programme, (Project number 09/22/67). This project is also supported and partly funded by UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre and The Royal Marsden and Institute for Cancer Research Biomedical Research Centre and is coordinated by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit (MRC CTU) at UCL. It is sponsored by University College London (UCL). Copyright (C) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 822
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: study design and diagnostic and baseline results of the ProtecT randomised phase 3 trial [J].
Lane, J. Athene ;
Donovan, Jenny L. ;
Davis, Michael ;
Walsh, Eleanor ;
Dedman, Daniel ;
Down, Liz ;
Turner, Emma L. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
Metcalfe, Chris ;
Peters, Tim J. ;
Neal, David E. ;
Hamdy, Freddie C. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (10) :1109-1118
[22]   Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs [J].
Leisenring, W ;
Alonzo, T ;
Pepe, MS .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :345-351
[23]   Systematic Review of Complications of Prostate Biopsy [J].
Loeb, Stacy ;
Vellekoop, Annelies ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Catto, James ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Nam, Robert ;
Rosario, Derek J. ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (06) :876-892
[24]  
Mowatt G, 2013, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V17, p[1, VII]
[25]   Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance [J].
Radtke, Jan P. ;
Kuru, Timur H. ;
Boxler, Silvan ;
Alt, Celine D. ;
Popeneciu, Ionel V. ;
Huettenbrink, Clemens ;
Klein, Tilman ;
Steinemann, Sarah ;
Bergstraesser, Claudia ;
Roethke, Matthias ;
Roth, Wilfried ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Hadaschik, Boris A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (01) :87-94
[26]   Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies [J].
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. ;
Waingankar, Nikhil ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Yaskiv, Oksana ;
Sonstegard, Anna M. ;
Fakhoury, Mathew ;
Olsson, Carl A. ;
Siegel, David N. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Ben-Levi, Eran ;
Villani, Robert .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11)
[27]   Comparison of Interreader Reproducibility of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scales for Evaluation of Multiparametric Prostate MRI [J].
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Lim, Ruth P. ;
Haghighi, Mershad ;
Somberg, Molly B. ;
Babb, James S. ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) :W612-W618
[28]  
STAMEY TA, 1993, CANCER, V71, P933, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::AID-CNCR2820711408>3.0.CO
[29]  
2-L
[30]   Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3+4=4+3? [J].
Stark, Jennifer R. ;
Perner, Sven ;
Stampfer, Meir J. ;
Sinnott, Jennifer A. ;
Finn, Stephen ;
Eisenstein, Anna S. ;
Ma, Jing ;
Fiorentino, Michelangelo ;
Kurth, Tobias ;
Loda, Massimo ;
Giovannucci, Edward L. ;
Rubin, Mark A. ;
Mucci, Lorelei A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (21) :3459-3464