Government dissemination of epidemic information as a policy instrument during COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Chinese cities

被引:18
作者
Wu, Xun [1 ]
Shi, Lei [1 ]
Lu, Xinyu [1 ]
Li, Xiaotong [1 ]
Ma, Liang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Information dissemination; Government openness; Digital government; Crisis management; Risk communication; LOCAL-GOVERNMENTS; TRANSPARENCY; DETERMINANTS; ACCOUNTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2022.103658
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
COVID-19 has given rise to a surge in the number of policy instruments used to deal with the pandemic at different levels of governments globally. While much attention has been placed on travel bans, lockdown, social distancing, and economic stimulus packages, government dissemination of epidemic information as a policy instrument has received less attention. Based on 14,637 news items collected from the portals of 79 municipal governments in China, this study aims to 1) conduct a content analysis of news items and construct three key attributes of governments' practices of epidemic information dissemination, namely, comprehensiveness, responsiveness, and the protection of privacy, and 2) study the patterns and determinants of the dissemination of epidemic information. Our results show that these cities vary substantially in how they disseminate statistical data and information on individual cases of COVID-19 infections within their localities, which are shaped by government performance in open data, severity of the pandemic, cities' administrative level, population, and health sector capacities. The findings generate theoretical and policy implications for government dissemination of epidemic information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Discerning the effect of privacy information transparency on privacy fatigue in e-government [J].
Agozie, Divine Q. ;
Kaya, Tugberk .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2021, 38 (04)
[2]   The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency [J].
Albalate del Sol, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY REFORM, 2013, 16 (01) :90-107
[3]   Determining Factors of Transparency and Accountability in Local Governments: A Meta-Analytic Study [J].
Alcaide Munoz, Laura ;
Rodriguez Bolivar, Manuel Pedro .
LEX LOCALIS-JOURNAL OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT, 2015, 13 (02) :129-160
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, WHO Strategic Communications Framework for Effective Communications
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NANDU NEWS
[6]  
Argente D. O., 2020, COST PRIVACY WELFARE, DOI [10.3386/w27220, DOI 10.3386/W27220]
[7]   Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency [J].
Bearfield, Domonic A. ;
Bowman, Ann O'M. .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 47 (02) :172-188
[8]   The Transboundary Crisis: Why we are unprepared and the road ahead [J].
Boin, Arjen .
JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 27 (01) :94-99
[9]  
CCDI, 2020, XINJING NEWS
[10]   Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy [J].
Christensen, Tom ;
Ma, Liang .
PUBLIC ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2021, 21 (04) :629-645