The Option Value of Returns: Theory and Empirical Evidence

被引:165
作者
Anderson, Eric T. [1 ]
Hansen, Karsten [1 ]
Simester, Duncan [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Dept Mkt, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] MIT, MIT Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
choice models; consumer behavior; decisions under uncertainty; direct marketing; e-commerce; econometric models; hierarchical Bayes analysis; latent variable models; marketing operations interface; service quality; targeting; returns; MONEY-BACK GUARANTEES; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; PERCEPTIONS; MODELS; COSTS; GOODS;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1080.0430
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
When a firm allows the return of previously purchased merchandise, it provides customers with an option that has measurable value. Whereas the option to return merchandise leads to an increase in gross revenue, it also creates additional costs. Selecting an optimal return policy requires balancing both demand and cost implications. In this paper, we develop a structural model of a consumer's decision to purchase and return an item that nests extant choice models as a special case. The model enables a firm to both measure the value to consumers of the return option and balance the costs and benefits of different return policies. We apply the model to a sample of data provided by a mail-order catalog company. We find considerable variation in the value of returns across customers and categories. When the option value is large, there are large increases in demand. For example, the option to return women's footwear is worth an average of more than $15 per purchase to customers and increases average purchase rates by more than 50%. We illustrate how the model can be used by a retailer to optimize his return policies across categories and customers.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 423
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   THE INFLUENCE OF PRIOR BELIEFS, FREQUENCY CUES, AND MAGNITUDE CUES ON CONSUMERS PERCEPTIONS OF COMPARATIVE PRICE DATA [J].
ALBA, JW ;
BRONIARCZYK, SM ;
SHIMP, TA ;
URBANY, JE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (02) :219-235
[2]  
Anderson E.T., 2009, PRICE AFFECTS RETURN
[3]   Measuring and mitigating the costs of stockouts [J].
Anderson, Eric T. ;
Fitzsimons, Gavan J. ;
Simester, Duncan .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (11) :1751-1763
[4]  
Blanchard D., 2005, Logistics Today, V46, P1
[5]   HOW PROMOTIONS WORK [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
BRIESCH, R ;
FOX, EJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (03) :G122-G132
[6]   Customer return policies for experience goods [J].
Che, YK .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 44 (01) :17-24
[7]   MONEY BACK GUARANTEES IN RETAILING - MATCHING PRODUCTS TO CONSUMER TASTES [J].
DAVIS, S ;
GERSTNER, E ;
HAGERTY, M .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1995, 71 (01) :7-22
[8]  
Davis S., 1998, J ECON BUS, V50, P445, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0148-6195(98)00013-7
[9]   Note. The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods [J].
Emmons, H ;
Gilbert, SM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (02) :276-283
[10]   Demonstrations and money-back guarantees: market mechanisms to reduce uncertainty [J].
Heiman, A ;
McWilliams, B ;
Zilberman, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2001, 54 (01) :71-84