Quantitative dynamic MRI and localisation of non-palpable prostate cancer

被引:9
作者
Cornud, F. [1 ]
Beuvon, F. [2 ]
Thevenin, F. [1 ]
Chauveinc, L. [3 ]
Vieillefond, A. [2 ]
Descazeaux, A. [4 ]
Flam, T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, Serv Radiol B, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Hop Cochin, Serv Anat Pathol, F-75014 Paris, France
[3] Clin Hartmann, Ctr Radiotherapie, F-92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, France
[4] Hop Cochin, Serv Urol, F-75014 Paris, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2009年 / 19卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Localisation; Tumor volume; Quantitative dynamic contrast; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; ENDORECTAL MR; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOPSY; FEATURES; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2009.01.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. - To determine whether quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI improves the performance of T2W-MRI for the localisation of non-palpable prostate cancer (PCa) and for the estimation of tumor volume. Materials and methods. - Twenty-three patients (PSA: 8.91 +/- 6.2 ng/m) with a non-palpable cancer underwent endorectal MRI with T2W and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging before radical prostatectomy. Each level of evaluation (apex, mid-portion, base) was divided in eight areas (24 areas per prostate and 552 areas for the 23 patients). Localisation and volume of tumor foci greater than 0,2 cc present on the radical prostatectmoy specimens were retrospectively correlated to their MR appearance on the 552 evaluated areas. The dynamic parameters included capillary permeability (K-trans), maximum concentration of gadolinium after 60s of perfusion ([Gd]) and wash-out (K-ep). Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to determine which parameters were predictive of PCa. Results. - Mean values of K-trans, K-ep and [Gd] were significantly higher in the 58 tumor foci greater than 0,2 cm(3) of the PZ and the TZ (all p < 0.05). Logistic regression for each zone provides provided a value of the area under the ROC curve of 0.83 for the PZ and 0.81 for the TZ (0.7 and 0.75, respectively, for the T2W imaging), only significant for the PZ (p < 0.002). Sensitivity and specificity were 79 and 77% for the PZ, 62.5 and 94% for the TZ. Above 0, 2 cm 3, tumor volume on dynamic MR showed a mean difference of 51 +/- 100% (range: - 145 to +248%). Conclusions. - Quantitative dynamic MRI is more accurate than T2W imaging for tumor localisation of non-palpable cancer greater than 0,2 cm 3, but the difference is only significant for the PZ. Above this volume, correlation between tumor volume measured on dynamic MRI and that on the specimen is poor. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 413
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort [J].
Dall'Era, Marc A. ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Stauf, Frank ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Meng, Maxwell V. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Perez, Nanette ;
Master, Viraj A. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (12) :2664-2670
[12]   MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary results [J].
de Bazelaire, CMJ ;
Duhamel, GD ;
Rofsky, NM ;
Alsop, DC .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :652-659
[13]   Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging [J].
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Vos, Pieter ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Krabbe, Paul F. M. ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :449-458
[14]   Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria:: is it reasonable? [J].
Girouin, Nicolas ;
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence ;
Senes, Alejandro Tonina ;
Bissery, Alvine ;
Rabilloud, Muriel ;
Marechal, Jean-Marie ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Lyonnet, Denis ;
Rouviere, Olivier .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (06) :1498-1509
[15]   Imaging prostate cancer: A multidisciplinary perspective [J].
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Eberhardt, Steven C. ;
Leibel, Steven A. ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) :28-53
[16]   Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: Correlation with histopathology [J].
Jager, GJ ;
Ruijter, ETG ;
vandeKaa, CA ;
delaRosette, JJMCH ;
Oosterhof, GON ;
Thornbury, JR ;
Barentsz, JO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) :845-852
[17]   Simple models improve the discrimination of prostate cancers from the peripheral gland by T1-weighted dynamic MRI [J].
Kiessling, F ;
Lichy, M ;
Grobholz, R ;
Heilmann, M ;
Farhan, N ;
Michel, MS ;
Trojan, L ;
Ederle, J ;
Abel, U ;
Kauczor, HU ;
Semmler, W ;
Delorme, S .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (10) :1793-1801
[18]   How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? [J].
Kirkham, Alexander P. S. ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Allen, Clare .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (06) :1163-1175
[19]   Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future [J].
Kurhanewicz, John ;
Vigneron, Daniel ;
Carroll, Peter ;
Coakley, Fergus .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) :71-77
[20]   Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer [J].
Mullerad, M ;
Hricak, H ;
Kuroiwa, K ;
Pucar, D ;
Chen, HN ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (06) :2158-2163