LL-ADR: Action Design Research in Living Labs

被引：6

作者：

Coenen, Tanguy ^{[1
]}

Donche, Vincent ^{[2
]}

Ballon, Pieter ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, SMIT, iMinds, Brussels, Belgium

[2] Univ Antwerp, Inst Educ & Informat Sci, Antwerp, Belgium

来源：

2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS) | 2015年

关键词：

SCIENCE;

D O I：

10.1109/HICSS.2015.484

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Design Science research is a mainstream Information systems discipline, yet Living Lab literature seems not to leverage its insights. The paper describes how Living Labs can be conducted as Design Science Research (DSR) by adapting the Action Design Research method. The resulting method is named LL-ADR. A case is presented to indicate how LL-ADR can be applied and findings for both Living Labs and DSR are discussed.

引用

页码：4029 / 4038

页数：10

共 20 条

[11]

Laureyssens T., P CHI 2014 VANC CAN

[12]

Leminen S., 2012, INNOVATION MANAG SPE

[13] Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs [J].

Nystrom, Anna-Greta ;

Leminen, Seppo ;

Westerlund, Mika ;

Kortelainen, Mika .

INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 43 (03) :483-495

[14] A design science research methodology for Information Systems Research [J].

Peffers, Ken ;

Tuunanen, Tuure ;

Rothenberger, Marcus A. ;

Chatterjee, Samir .

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 24 (03) :45-77

[15]

Pierson J., 2005, Ethnogr. Prax. Ind. Conf. Proc, V2005, P114, DOI [10.1111/j.1559-8918.2005.tb00012.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1559-8918.2005.TB00012.X]

[16]

Schuurman Dimitri, 2012, J. theor. appl. electron. commer. res., V7, P49, DOI 10.4067/S0718-18762012000300006

[17]

Sein MK, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P37

[18]

Venable John, 2012, Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. Proceedings 7th International Conference, DESRIST 2012, P423, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31

[19]

Westerlund M., 2011, TIM REV OKT

[20] The social shaping of technology [J].

Williams, R ;

Edge, D .

RESEARCH POLICY, 1996, 25 (06) :865-899

← 1 2 →