Assessing the temporal reproducibility of human esophageal motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:4
作者
Paine, P. A. [1 ]
Aziz, Q. [1 ]
Gardener, E. [1 ]
Hobson, A. [1 ]
Mistry, S. [1 ]
Thompson, D. G. [1 ]
Hamdy, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Hope Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Sci & Stat, Salford M6 8HD, Lancs, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
motor-evoked potential; esophagus; reproducibility; temporal; transcranial magnetic stimulation; viscerosomatic;
D O I
10.1097/01.wnp.0000209578.08391.e2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although the electrophysiological properties and reproducibility of somatic limb motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are well characterized, little is known about the reproducibility of MEPs for viscerosomatic structures such as the esophagus. Aim: To determine the temporal reproducibility of esophageal MEPs to TMS. Methods: MEPs to TMS were recorded from the proximal esophagus, using a swallowed catheter housing a pair of electrodes, in eight healthy subjects at five stimulus intensities (SI) (motor threshold [MT] to 20% above MT). For each SI, 20 consecutive TMS stimuli at 5-second intervals were delivered over a single scalp site (dominant hemisphere at site exhibiting MT at lowest SI) and repeated 40 and 80 minutes thereafter. MEP amplitudes and latencies were measured, and means were sequentially calculated for each SI and then log-transformed. The repeatability coefficients (RC) for the three time points were calculated across each set of 20 stimuli and presented as an exponential ratio. Results: Best RC (amplitude/latency) were achieved at 120% SI relative to MT, being 1.8/1.2 (optimal = 1.0). For lower intensities of 115%, 110%, 105%, and 100% SI, the RC were 2.1/1.2,2.1/1.1, 2.4/1.2, and 2.6/1.4, respectively. For all SI, the greatest reductions in RC occurred over the first 10 stimuli, with little additional gain beyond this number. Conclusions: Latencies of esophageal MEP to TMS across intensities are highly reproducible, whereas amplitudes are more stimulus intensity-dependent, being most reliable and reproducible at the highest stimulus strengths. Significance: Using careful parameters, TMS can be used reliably in future studies of viscerosomatic structures, although the size of the response variability needs to be taken into account when assessing changes in cortico-fugal activity.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 380
页数:7
相关论文
共 93 条
[61]   Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle -: A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials [J].
Magistris, MR ;
Rösler, KM ;
Truffert, A ;
Myers, JP .
BRAIN, 1998, 121 :437-450
[62]   MOTOR CORTICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE DIAPHRAGM IN MAN [J].
MASKILL, D ;
MURPHY, K ;
MIER, A ;
OWEN, M ;
GUZ, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1991, 443 :105-121
[63]   The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: A replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex [J].
McConnell, KA ;
Nahas, Z ;
Shastri, A ;
Lorberbaum, JP ;
Kozel, FA ;
Bohning, DE ;
George, MS .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 49 (05) :454-459
[64]   Do alternate methods of analysing motor evoked potentials give comparable results? [J].
McDonnell, MN ;
Ridding, MC ;
Miles, TS .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 136 (01) :63-67
[65]   FOCAL DEPRESSION OF CORTICAL EXCITABILITY INDUCED BY FATIGUING MUSCLE-CONTRACTION - A TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION STUDY [J].
MCKAY, WB ;
TUEL, SM ;
SHERWOOD, AM ;
STOKIC, DS ;
DIMITRIJEVIC, MR .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 105 (02) :276-282
[66]   Improved reproducibility of magnetic stimulation evoked motor potentials in the human masseter by a new method for locating stimulation sites on the scalp [J].
McMillan, AS ;
Watson, C ;
Walshaw, D .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (08) :665-668
[67]   MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION WITH A DOUBLE COIL - THE IMPORTANCE OF COIL ORIENTATION [J].
MILLS, KR ;
BONIFACE, SJ ;
SCHUBERT, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01) :17-21
[68]   A new method for reproducible coil positioning in transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping [J].
Miranda, PC ;
deCarvalho, M ;
Conceicao, I ;
Luis, MLS ;
DuclaSoares, E .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (02) :116-123
[69]   Analogous corticocortical inhibition and facilitation in ipsilateral and contralateral human motor cortex representations of the tongue [J].
Muellbacher, W ;
Boroojerdi, B ;
Ziemann, U ;
Hallett, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) :550-558
[70]   A stereotactic method for image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation validated with fMRI and motor-evoked potentials [J].
Neggers, SFW ;
Langerak, TR ;
Schutter, DJLG ;
Mandl, RCW ;
Ramsey, NF ;
Lemmens, PJJ ;
Postma, A .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 21 (04) :1805-1817