How much does sorting increase inequality?

被引:105
作者
Kremer, M
机构
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1162/003355397555145
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Some commentators argue that increased sorting into internally homogeneous neighborhoods, schools, and marriages is radically polarizing society. Calibration of a formal model, however, suggests that the steady-state standard deviation of education would increase only 1.7 percent if the correlation between neighbors' education doubled, and would fall only 1.6 percent if educational sorting by neighborhood disappeared. The steady-state standard deviation of education would grow 1 percent if the correlation between spouses' education increased from 0.6 to 0.8. In fact, marital and neighborhood sorting have been stable, or even decreasing historically. Sorting has somewhat more significant effects on intergenerational mobility than on inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 139
页数:25
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   SHIFTING BOUNDARIES - TRENDS IN RELIGIOUS AND EDUCATIONAL HOMOGAMY [J].
KALMIJN, M .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 56 (06) :786-800
[32]  
KREMER M, 1996, UNPUB WAGE INEQUALIT
[33]   5 DECADES OF EDUCATIONAL ASSORTATIVE MATING [J].
MARE, RD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 56 (01) :15-32
[34]  
Mare Robert D., 1996, Social differentiation and social inequality
[35]   RANDOM GROUP EFFECTS AND THE PRECISION OF REGRESSION ESTIMATES [J].
MOULTON, BR .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1986, 32 (03) :385-397
[36]  
MULLIGAN C, 1995, EC BIOL APPROACHES I
[37]  
Pearson K., 1896, PHILOS T R SOC A, V187, P253, DOI [DOI 10.1098/RSTA.1896.0007, 10.1098/rsta.1896.0007]
[38]  
PRITCHETT L, 1995, 1522 POL RES
[39]  
SIEGEL P, 1986, METHODOLOGY SOCIAL S, P28
[40]  
SOLON G, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P393