Can knowledge transfer within MNCs hurt subsidiary performance? The role of subsidiary entrepreneurial culture and capabilities

被引:49
作者
Li, Jingxun [1 ]
Lee, Ruby P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yanbian Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Dept Business Adm, Yanji 133002, Peoples R China
[2] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Mkt, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
MNC knowledge transfer; Entrepreneurial culture; Capabilities; MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATIONS; ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITIES; MARKET RESPONSIVENESS; FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES; EMERGING ECONOMIES; IMPACT; HEADQUARTERS; FLOWS; FIRM; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwb.2014.09.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study extends the literature on knowledge transfer in MNCs by exploring how two sources of knowledge transfers, one from headquarters and the second from other peer subsidiaries, influence a focal subsidiary's capabilities and performance. Drawing on the tenet of the resource-based and dynamic capabilities perspectives, and using data from 167 foreign subsidiaries in China, we find that both sources of knowledge transfers positively influence a focal subsidiary's capabilities, albeit at different rates. Our results further show that although a focal subsidiary's entrepreneurial culture strengthens the effect of headquarters knowledge transfer on its capabilities, it weakens the impact of peer subsidiary knowledge transfer on capabilities. These results suggest that a focal subsidiary's entrepreneurial culture serves as a double-edged sword when it comes to knowledge transfer within its MNC network. This study provides key implications for management in terms of the mechanisms and processes (i.e., entrepreneurial culture and capabilities) that drive or hinder the efficacy of knowledge transfer from headquarters and peer subsidiaries on a focal subsidiary's performance. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 673
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
[71]  
Si S. X., 2001, GLOBAL FOCUS INT J B, V13, P187
[72]  
Si S.X., 1999, Academy of Management Executive, V13, P83, DOI DOI 10.5465/AME.1999.1567354
[73]   Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [J].
Szulanski, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :27-43
[74]  
Teece D.J., 2004, Handbook on Knowledge Management, V1, P129
[75]  
Teece D., 2009, DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES
[76]  
Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P509, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO
[77]  
2-Z
[78]   The Effect of Quantity, Quality and Timing of Headquarters-initiated Knowledge Flows on Subsidiary Performance [J].
Tran, Yen ;
Mahnke, Volker ;
Ambos, Bjoern .
MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2010, 50 (04) :493-511
[79]   How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: a study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units [J].
van Wijk, Raymond ;
Jansen, Justin J. P. ;
Van den Bosch, Frans A. J. ;
Volberda, Henk W. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2012, 24 (09) :929-950
[80]   Dual paths to performance: the impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance [J].
Venaik, S ;
Midgley, DF ;
Devinney, TM .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2005, 36 (06) :655-675