Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand

被引:31
作者
Jeon, Yongsik [2 ]
Herriges, Joseph A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Samsung Res Inst Finance, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Contingent behavior; Nonmarket valuation; PREFERENCES; VALUATION; LOGIT;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-009-9313-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recreation demand modeling efforts are often limited by the range of variation in observed environmental quality. To address this limitation, the practitioners increasingly make use of contingent behavior (CB) data; i.e., asking survey respondents to forecast their trip patterns under hypothetical quality conditions. However, relatively little is known as to whether these stated responses are consistent with how households response to actual quality variation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the convergent validity of CB data with observed trip patterns. Toward this end, we jointly model recreational lake usage in Iowa using observed and CB trip data collected from the 2004 Iowa Lake Survey. The Iowa lakes Survey collected three sets of trip data for 131 lakes in the state: (a) actual trips in 2004, (b) anticipated trips in 2005 to the same lakes given current lake conditions and (c) anticipated trips in 2005 given hypothetical improvements to a subset of the lakes. The three types of recreation demand data provide a unique opportunity to investigate the convergent validity of individual responses to actual versus hypothetical environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 250
页数:28
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]   Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Swait, J ;
Boxall, P ;
Louviere, J ;
Williams, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :65-84
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[4]   Combining revealed and stated preferences: Consistency tests and their interpretations [J].
Azevedo, CD ;
Herriges, JA ;
Kling, CL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (03) :525-537
[5]   ESTIMATION OF SWITCHING MODELS FROM REVEALED PREFERENCES AND STATED INTENTIONS [J].
BENAKIVA, M ;
MORIKAWA, T .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1990, 24 (06) :485-495
[6]  
Cameron TA, 1996, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V21, P130
[7]  
EGAN KJ, 2008, AM J AGR EC IN PRESS
[8]  
Englin J., 1996, Environmental and Resource Economics, V7, P133, DOI 10.1007/BF00699288
[9]   Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses [J].
Grijalva, TC ;
Berrens, RP ;
Bohara, AK ;
Shaw, WD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (02) :401-414
[10]   Inducing patterns of correlation and substitution in repeated logit models of recreation demand [J].
Herriges, JA ;
Phaneuf, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :1076-1090