A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.

被引:4664
作者
van de Vijver, MJ
He, YD
van 't Veer, LJ
Dai, H
Hart, AAM
Voskuil, DW
Schreiber, GJ
Peterse, JL
Roberts, C
Marton, MJ
Parrish, M
Atsma, D
Witteveen, A
Glas, A
Delahaye, L
van der Velde, T
Bartelink, H
Rodenhuis, S
Rutgers, ET
Friend, SH
Bernards, R
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Mol Carcinogenesis, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Diagnost Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Med Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Biometr, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Surg Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Ctr Biomed Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Rosetta Inpharmat, Kirkland, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa021967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A more accurate means of prognostication in breast cancer will improve the selection of patients for adjuvant systemic therapy. Methods: Using microarray analysis to evaluate our previously established 70-gene prognosis profile, we classified a series of 295 consecutive patients with primary breast carcinomas as having a gene-expression signature associated with either a poor prognosis or a good prognosis. All patients had stage I or II breast cancer and were younger than 53 years old; 151 had lymph-node-negative disease, and 144 had lymph-node-positive disease. We evaluated the predictive power of the prognosis profile using univariable and multivariable statistical analyses. Results: Among the 295 patients, 180 had a poor-prognosis signature and 115 had a good-prognosis signature, and the mean (+/-SE) overall 10-year survival rates were 54.6+/-4.4 percent and 94.5+/-2.6 percent, respectively. At 10 years, the probability of remaining free of distant metastases was 50.6+/-4.5 percent in the group with a poor-prognosis signature and 85.2+/-4.3 percent in the group with a good-prognosis signature. The estimated hazard ratio for distant metastases in the group with a poor-prognosis signature, as compared with the group with the good-prognosis signature, was 5.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 9.0; P<0.001). This ratio remained significant when the groups were analyzed according to lymph-node status. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the prognosis profile was a strong independent factor in predicting disease outcome. Conclusions: The gene-expression profile we studied is a more powerful predictor of the outcome of disease in young patients with breast cancer than standard systems based on clinical and histologic criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:1999 / 2009
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. [J].
Hedenfalk, I ;
Duggan, D ;
Chen, YD ;
Radmacher, M ;
Bittner, M ;
Simon, R ;
Meltzer, P ;
Gusterson, B ;
Esteller, M ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Wilfond, B ;
Borg, Å ;
Trent, J ;
Raffeld, M ;
Yakhini, Z ;
Ben-Dor, A ;
Dougherty, E ;
Kononen, J ;
Bubendorf, L ;
Fehrle, W ;
Pittaluga, S ;
Gruvberger, S ;
Loman, N ;
Johannsoson, O ;
Olsson, H ;
Sauter, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (08) :539-548
[12]   Expression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer [J].
Hughes, TR ;
Mao, M ;
Jones, AR ;
Burchard, J ;
Marton, MJ ;
Shannon, KW ;
Lefkowitz, SM ;
Ziman, M ;
Schelter, JM ;
Meyer, MR ;
Kobayashi, S ;
Davis, C ;
Dai, HY ;
He, YDD ;
Stephaniants, SB ;
Cavet, G ;
Walker, WL ;
West, A ;
Coffey, E ;
Shoemaker, DD ;
Stoughton, R ;
Blanchard, AP ;
Friend, SH ;
Linsley, PS .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :342-347
[13]   New prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence [J].
Isaacs, C ;
Stearns, V ;
Hayes, DF .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2001, 28 (01) :53-67
[14]  
KLEIN JP, 1991, SCAND J STAT, V18, P333
[15]   THE ROBUST INFERENCE FOR THE COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL [J].
LIN, DY ;
WEI, LJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 84 (408) :1074-1078
[16]   Molecular portraits of human breast tumours [J].
Perou, CM ;
Sorlie, T ;
Eisen, MB ;
van de Rijn, M ;
Jeffrey, SS ;
Rees, CA ;
Pollack, JR ;
Ross, DT ;
Johnsen, H ;
Akslen, LA ;
Fluge, O ;
Pergamenschikov, A ;
Williams, C ;
Zhu, SX ;
Lonning, PE ;
Borresen-Dale, AL ;
Brown, PO ;
Botstein, D .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6797) :747-752
[17]   Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications [J].
Sorlie, T ;
Perou, CM ;
Tibshirani, R ;
Aas, T ;
Geisler, S ;
Johnsen, H ;
Hastie, T ;
Eisen, MB ;
van de Rijn, M ;
Jeffrey, SS ;
Thorsen, T ;
Quist, H ;
Matese, JC ;
Brown, PO ;
Botstein, D ;
Lonning, PE ;
Borresen-Dale, AL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (19) :10869-10874
[18]   MARTINGALE-BASED RESIDUALS FOR SURVIVAL MODELS [J].
THERNEAU, TM ;
GRAMBSCH, PM ;
FLEMING, TR .
BIOMETRIKA, 1990, 77 (01) :147-160
[19]   Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer [J].
van't Veer, LJ ;
Dai, HY ;
van de Vijver, MJ ;
He, YDD ;
Hart, AAM ;
Mao, M ;
Peterse, HL ;
van der Kooy, K ;
Marton, MJ ;
Witteveen, AT ;
Schreiber, GJ ;
Kerkhoven, RM ;
Roberts, C ;
Linsley, PS ;
Bernards, R ;
Friend, SH .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6871) :530-536
[20]   Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles [J].
West, M ;
Blanchette, C ;
Dressman, H ;
Huang, E ;
Ishida, S ;
Spang, R ;
Zuzan, H ;
Olson, JA ;
Marks, JR ;
Nevins, JR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (20) :11462-11467