A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.

被引:4664
作者
van de Vijver, MJ
He, YD
van 't Veer, LJ
Dai, H
Hart, AAM
Voskuil, DW
Schreiber, GJ
Peterse, JL
Roberts, C
Marton, MJ
Parrish, M
Atsma, D
Witteveen, A
Glas, A
Delahaye, L
van der Velde, T
Bartelink, H
Rodenhuis, S
Rutgers, ET
Friend, SH
Bernards, R
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Mol Carcinogenesis, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Diagnost Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Med Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Biometr, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Surg Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Ctr Biomed Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Rosetta Inpharmat, Kirkland, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa021967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A more accurate means of prognostication in breast cancer will improve the selection of patients for adjuvant systemic therapy. Methods: Using microarray analysis to evaluate our previously established 70-gene prognosis profile, we classified a series of 295 consecutive patients with primary breast carcinomas as having a gene-expression signature associated with either a poor prognosis or a good prognosis. All patients had stage I or II breast cancer and were younger than 53 years old; 151 had lymph-node-negative disease, and 144 had lymph-node-positive disease. We evaluated the predictive power of the prognosis profile using univariable and multivariable statistical analyses. Results: Among the 295 patients, 180 had a poor-prognosis signature and 115 had a good-prognosis signature, and the mean (+/-SE) overall 10-year survival rates were 54.6+/-4.4 percent and 94.5+/-2.6 percent, respectively. At 10 years, the probability of remaining free of distant metastases was 50.6+/-4.5 percent in the group with a poor-prognosis signature and 85.2+/-4.3 percent in the group with a good-prognosis signature. The estimated hazard ratio for distant metastases in the group with a poor-prognosis signature, as compared with the group with the good-prognosis signature, was 5.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 9.0; P<0.001). This ratio remained significant when the groups were analyzed according to lymph-node status. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the prognosis profile was a strong independent factor in predicting disease outcome. Conclusions: The gene-expression profile we studied is a more powerful predictor of the outcome of disease in young patients with breast cancer than standard systems based on clinical and histologic criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:1999 / 2009
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
[2]   Identification of high risk breast-cancer patients by gene expression profiling [J].
Ahr, A ;
Karn, T ;
Solbach, C ;
Seiter, T ;
Strebhardt, K ;
Holtrich, U ;
Kaufmann, M .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9301) :131-132
[3]   Metastasis genes: A progression puzzle [J].
Bernards, R ;
Weinberg, RA .
NATURE, 2002, 418 (6900) :823-823
[4]  
Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]  
Eifel P, 2001, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V93, P979
[7]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[8]   Meeting highlights: International consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer [J].
Goldhirsch, A ;
Glick, JH ;
Gelber, RD ;
Coates, AS ;
Senn, HJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (18) :3817-3827
[9]  
GRAMBSCH PM, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P515
[10]  
Gruvberger S, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P5979