An upward feedback field experiment: Supervisors' cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates

被引:92
作者
Atwater, LE [1 ]
Waldman, DA [1 ]
Atwater, D [1 ]
Cartier, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ W, Phoenix, AZ 85069 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00202.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A field experiment was conducted to examine outcomes associated with an upward feedback program in a policing agency. Experimental groups included 110 supervisors who were randomly assigned to I of 2 conditions: (a) a feedback group in which supervisors and subordinates completed surveys and received feedback at two time periods, or (b) a survey-only group in which supervisors and subordinates completed surveys at Times I and 2, but supervisors received feedback only at Time 2. Results showed no significant improvement for the feedback or survey-only group with regard to subordinate ratings of leadership. However, a significant decrease in self-rated leadership scores occurred between Time 3 and Time 2 for the supervisors receiving feedback at Time 1, and no such changes were observed for supervisors who were only surveyed at Time 1. In addition, Time 1 to Time 2 leadership change was predicted by organizational cynicism and the extent to which the recipient reacts positively to upward feedback and takes steps to improve. Thus, individual attitudes appear to be relevant to behavior change following upward feedback. In addition, leadership measured at Time I predicted supervisors' commitment to their subordinates at Time 2 for the feedback group, but not for the survey-only group. Such results demonstrate that outcomes in addition to performance, such as commitment to subordinates, need to be considered in the implementation of upward feedback programs.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 297
页数:23
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, POWER 360 FEEDBACK L
[2]  
[Anonymous], FEEDBACK MANAGERS
[3]   Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process [J].
Antonioni, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1996, 25 (02) :24-38
[4]   SELF-REGULATION FOR MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS - THE ROLE OF ACTIVE FEEDBACK SEEKING [J].
ASHFORD, SJ ;
TSUI, AS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 34 (02) :251-280
[5]   THE INFLUENCE OF UPWARD FEEDBACK ON SELF-RATINGS AND FOLLOWER-RATINGS OF LEADERSHIP [J].
ATWATER, L ;
ROUSH, P ;
FISCHTHAL, A .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :35-59
[6]   Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? [J].
Atwater, LE ;
Ostroff, C ;
Yammarino, FJ ;
Fleenor, JW .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :577-598
[7]   DOES SELF-OTHER AGREEMENT ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS MODERATE THE VALIDITY OF LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS [J].
ATWATER, LE ;
YAMMARINO, FJ .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 45 (01) :141-164
[8]  
Atwater LE, 1997, RES PERS H, V15, P121
[9]   Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test [J].
Bauer, TN ;
Green, SG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (06) :1538-1567
[10]  
BERNARDIN JH, 1995, UPWARD FEEDBACK UPS