Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods

被引:67
作者
Filippini, Massimo [2 ,3 ]
Hrovatin, Nevenka [1 ]
Zoric, Jelena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Econ, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lugano, Dept Econ, Lugano, Switzerland
关键词
SFA; cost frontier function; cost inefficiency; water distribution utilities; price regulation;
D O I
10.1007/s11123-007-0069-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study estimates cost inefficiency and economies of scale of Slovenian water distribution utilities over the 1997-2003 period by employing several different stochastic frontier methods. The results indicate that significant cost inefficiencies are present in the utilities. An introduction of incentive-based price regulation scheme might help resolve this problem. However, the inefficiency scores obtained from different cost frontier models are not found to be robust. The levels of inefficiency estimates as well as the rankings depend on the econometric specification of the model. The established lack of robustness can be at least partly explained by different ability of the models to separate unobserved heterogeneity from inefficiency. Newly proposed true fixed effects model (Greene, J Econom 126:269-303, 2005; J Prod Anal 23(1):7-32, 2005) appears to perform better than the conventional panel data models with respect to distinguishing between unobserved heterogeneity and inefficiency. On the other hand, different models produce fairly robust results with respect to estimates of economies of output density, customer density and economies of scale. The optimal size of a company is found to closely corresponds to the sample median. Economies of scale are found in small-sized utilities, while large companies exhibit diseconomies of scale.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 182
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   The structure of municipal water supply costs: Application to a panel of French local communities [J].
Garcia, S ;
Thomas, A .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2001, 16 (01) :5-29
[22]   Fixed and random effects in Stochastic frontier models [J].
Greene, W .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2005, 23 (01) :7-32
[23]   Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model [J].
Greene, W .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 126 (02) :269-303
[24]  
Guyomard H., 1989, Agricultural Economics, V3, P213, DOI 10.1016/0169-5150(89)90031-5
[25]  
HESHMATI A, 1994, J PROD ANAL, V5, P45
[26]   International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities [J].
Jamasb, T ;
Pollitt, M .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (15) :1609-1622
[27]  
KIM HY, 1988, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V18, P479
[28]  
Kumbhakar S., 2000, STOCHASTIC FRONTIER, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139174411, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174411]
[29]   ESTIMATION OF TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY IN PANEL DATA MODELS WITH FIRM- AND TIME-SPECIFIC EFFECTS [J].
KUMBHAKAR, SC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1991, 36 (01) :43-48
[30]  
MASSARUTTO A, 1999, C PRIC WAT EC ENV SO