The effect of environmental regulation on firms' competitive performance: The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions

被引:371
作者
Testa, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
Iraldo, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Frey, Marco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, IEFE Inst Environm & Energy Policy & Econ, Milan, Italy
[3] CESISP Ctr Dev Prod Sustainabil, I-16145 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Environmental regulation; Competitive performance; Building & construction sector; MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; INNOVATION; POLICY; US; CERTIFICATION; TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENT; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a considerable debate on the effects of environmental regulation on competitive performance. Based on survey data, this paper analyzesthe two main research questions, derived from literature, on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness, by focusing on firms operating in the building and construction sector, i.e.: 1) whether environmental policy stringency affects the competitive performance of firms in the building and construction sector 2) and how a specific form of environmental regulation (direct regulation, economic instruments and soft instruments) affects this performance? By applying a regression analysis, we find that a more stringent environmental regulation, measured by inspection frequency, provides a positive impulse for increasing investments in advanced technological equipment and innovative products and on business performance. Moreover, a well-designed "direct regulation" appears to be the most effective policy instrument for prompting the positive impact of environmental policies on innovation and intangible performance while economic instruments do negatively affect business performance. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2136 / 2144
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis [J].
Ederington, J ;
Minier, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2003, 36 (01) :137-154
[12]  
GANGADHARAN L, 2006, ECOLOGICAL EC, P477
[13]   ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH - THE CASE OF FOSSIL-FUELED ELECTRIC-POWER GENERATION [J].
GOLLOP, FM ;
ROBERTS, MJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1983, 91 (04) :654-674
[15]   Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation [J].
Gray, WB ;
Shadbegian, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) :384-402
[16]  
Gray WB, 1998, J IND ECON, V46, P235
[17]   THE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF INTANGIBLE RESOURCES [J].
HALL, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1992, 13 (02) :135-144
[18]   The use of economic instruments and green taxes to complement an environmental regulatory regime [J].
Hawkins, R .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2000, 123 (1-4) :379-393
[19]   Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment:: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces [J].
He, Jie .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (01) :228-245
[20]   The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles [J].
Helfat, CE ;
Peteraf, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (10) :997-1010