Controlling decision-making practice in organizations

被引:65
作者
Sutcliffe, KM [1 ]
McNamara, G
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Business, Dept Org Behav & Human Resource Management, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Management, Broad Grad Sch Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
decision-making process; decision routines; decision effectiveness;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.12.4.484.10634
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How are decision practices fostered in organizations and how are they linked to decision outcomes? This study addresses these questions by examining one financial institution's efforts to standardize and control decision making across geographically separated organizational units. We argue that decisionmaker behavior is situated and is not simply a function of individual choice. Rather, in organizational settings decisionmakers are subject to a hierarchy of influences that affect the decision processes they use and their resulting decision choices. To test our ideas, we examined 900 borrower "risk rating" decisions and found general support for our hypotheses. Decision makers were more likely to use the prescribed practice when decisions were important, when the decision target was known, and when the decision maker was located in a larger subunit. Decision makers altered their decision practices in the short term. but in the long term they appeared to partially revert to their earlier practices. Reliance on prescribed practice fostered stability in decisions, but surprisingly appeared to negatively affect future judgments. The findings indicate that organizations can change the more microaspects of decision making, but these changes may be transitory. Moreover the results suggest that decision makers may become complacent when they rely on prescribed decision practices. a tendency that can have untoward consequences for the organizations in which they are embedded.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 501
页数:18
相关论文
共 80 条
[61]   Issues in cognitive psychology: Implications for professional education [J].
Regehr, G ;
Norman, GR .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (09) :988-1001
[62]  
ROBERTSON PJ, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P619, DOI 10.5465/256595
[63]   An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice [J].
Ryan, AM ;
McFarland, L ;
Baron, H ;
Page, R .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (02) :359-391
[64]   Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning [J].
Schein, EH .
SYSTEMS PRACTICE, 1996, 9 (01) :27-47
[65]  
Scott W.R., 1992, Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives
[66]  
SEABRIGHT MA, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P122, DOI 10.5465/256475
[67]  
SITKIN SB, 1992, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V14, P231
[68]   Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [J].
Szulanski, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :27-43
[69]   THE IMPACT OF ACCOUNTABILITY ON JUDGMENT AND CHOICE - TOWARD A SOCIAL CONTINGENCY-MODEL [J].
TETLOCK, PE .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 25 :331-376
[70]  
Thompson J.D., 1959, Comparative Studies in Administration, P195