Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships

被引:67
作者
Branzei, Oana
Vertinsky, Ilan
Camp, Ronald D., II
机构
[1] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[3] Univ Regina, Fac Adm, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
关键词
trust; culture; signs; attribution;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.11.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study develops a culture-contingent model of trust formation in emergent relationships by comparing how trust-warranting signs shape attributions of trustworthiness to unfamiliar trustees in collectivist versus individualist cultures. We predict and find that the effectiveness of dispositional and contextual signs varies systematically depending on trustors' national culture. Collectivists tend to rely less on dispositional signs and more on situational signs than individualists. This difference fosters distinct trust-building pathways. Individualists bestow trust based on a trustee's perceived ability and integrity, collectivists' trusting choices depend to a greater extent on predictable, benevolent interactions with a potential partner. These findings suggest that, in cross-cultural encounters, signs aligned with trustors' cultural expectations hasten trust production. Mismatched signs are impotent, even off-putting. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 82
页数:22
相关论文
共 110 条
[61]  
Luhmann N., 1979, TRUST POWER
[62]   Contracts, opportunism and trust: Self-interest and social orientation [J].
Lyons, B ;
Mehta, J .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 21 (02) :239-257
[63]   THE USE OF CAUSAL INDICATORS IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELS - SOME PRACTICAL ISSUES [J].
MACCALLUM, RC ;
BROWNE, MW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (03) :533-541
[64]   Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Browne, MW ;
Cai, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (01) :19-35
[65]   The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust [J].
Malhotra, D ;
Murnighan, JK .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (03) :534-559
[66]  
March JG., 1994, PRIMER DECISION MARK
[67]   CULTURE AND THE SELF - IMPLICATIONS FOR COGNITION, EMOTION, AND MOTIVATION [J].
MARKUS, HR ;
KITAYAMA, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (02) :224-253
[68]   A COLLECTIVE FEAR OF THE COLLECTIVE - IMPLICATIONS FOR SELVES AND THEORIES OF SELVES [J].
MARKUS, HR ;
KITAYAMA, S .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1994, 20 (05) :568-579
[69]   Perceiver-induced constraint and attitude attribution in Japan and the US: A case for the cultural dependence of the correspondence bias [J].
Masuda, T ;
Kitayama, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 40 (03) :409-416
[70]  
MAYER RC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P709, DOI 10.2307/258792