Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2

被引:97
作者
Bluman, LG
Rimer, BK
Berry, DA
Borstelmann, N
Iglehart, JD
Regan, K
Schildkraut, J
Winer, EP
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Breast Oncol Ctr, Dept Care Coordinat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Gillette Ctr Womens Canc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Canc Prevent Detect & Control Res Program, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Inst Stat & Decis Sci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[6] NCI, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1040
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study examined baseline knowledge, beliefs, and risk perceptions among a group of 200 women with breast and/or ovarian cancer who participated in a trial designed to improve decision making about genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Patients and Methods: Women were identified by self-referral, physician referral, and tumor registry extraction and invited to participate in a randomized trial in which testing for BRCA I and BRCA2 was offered free of charge, Subjects completed baseline questionnaires and interviews that assessed knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of risk of having an alteration in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Results: Sixty percent of women overestimated their chances of having a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation compared with estimates from a BRCA 1/BRCA2 risk model. Women who have at least three relatives with breast or ovarian cancer were one third (95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6) as likely to overestimate their risk of having a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation compared with women who have two or fewer affected relatives. Knowledge wets limited about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and cancer risk associated with gene mutations, Eighty-four percent of the women indicated a probable or definite interest in testing. Conclusion: A high proportion of the high-risk women in this study had knowledge deficits about BRCA1 and BRCA2 and overestimated their risk of having a mutation, Although some degree of caution should be used in generalizing the results of this study to practice settings, the data provide insight into the challenges clinicians will face in communicating with patients about cancer genetics. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1046
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing [J].
Lerman, C ;
Biesecker, B ;
Benkendorf, JL ;
Kerner, J ;
GomezCaminero, A ;
Hughes, C ;
Reed, MM .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (02) :148-157
[22]   BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer - A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes [J].
Lerman, C ;
Narod, S ;
Schulman, K ;
Hughes, C ;
GomezCaminero, A ;
Bonney, G ;
Gold, K ;
Trock, B ;
Main, D ;
Lynch, J ;
Fulmore, C ;
Snyder, C ;
Lemon, SJ ;
Conway, T ;
Tonin, P ;
Lenoir, G ;
Lynch, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (24) :1885-1892
[23]   ATTITUDES ABOUT GENETIC TESTING FOR BREAST-OVARIAN CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY [J].
LERMAN, C ;
DALY, M ;
MASNY, A ;
BALSHEM, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) :843-850
[24]   PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES IN GENETIC TESTING FOR BREAST-CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY [J].
LERMAN, C ;
CROYLE, R .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (06) :609-616
[25]   EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUALIZED BREAST-CANCER RISK COUNSELING - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
LERMAN, C ;
LUSTBADER, E ;
RIMER, B ;
DALY, M ;
MILLER, S ;
SANDS, C ;
BALSHEM, A .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (04) :286-292
[26]   INTEREST IN GENETIC TESTING AMONG FIRST-DEGREE RELATIVES OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS [J].
LERMAN, C ;
SEAY, J ;
BALSHEM, A ;
AUDRAIN, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1995, 57 (03) :385-392
[27]  
Lerman C, 1994, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P171
[28]   Familial breast cancer: A controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling [J].
Lloyd, S ;
Watson, M ;
Waites, B ;
Meyer, L ;
Eeles, R ;
Ebbs, S ;
Tylee, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 74 (03) :482-487
[29]   A STRONG CANDIDATE FOR THE BREAST AND OVARIAN-CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY GENE BRCA1 [J].
MIKI, Y ;
SWENSEN, J ;
SHATTUCKEIDENS, D ;
FUTREAL, PA ;
HARSHMAN, K ;
TAVTIGIAN, S ;
LIU, QY ;
COCHRAN, C ;
BENNETT, LM ;
DING, W ;
BELL, R ;
ROSENTHAL, J ;
HUSSEY, C ;
TRAN, T ;
MCCLURE, M ;
FRYE, C ;
HATTIER, T ;
PHELPS, R ;
HAUGENSTRANO, A ;
KATCHER, H ;
YAKUMO, K ;
GHOLAMI, Z ;
SHAFFER, D ;
STONE, S ;
BAYER, S ;
WRAY, C ;
BOGDEN, R ;
DAYANANTH, P ;
WARD, J ;
TONIN, P ;
NAROD, S ;
BRISTOW, PK ;
NORRIS, FH ;
HELVERING, L ;
MORRISON, P ;
ROSTECK, P ;
LAI, M ;
BARRETT, JC ;
LEWIS, C ;
NEUHAUSEN, S ;
CANNONALBRIGHT, L ;
GOLDGAR, D ;
WISEMAN, R ;
KAMB, A ;
SKOLNICK, MH .
SCIENCE, 1994, 266 (5182) :66-71
[30]   Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [J].
Offit, K ;
Biesecker, BB ;
Burt, RW ;
Clayton, EW ;
Garber, JE ;
Kahn, MJE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) :1730-1736