Mean-variance analysis of a single supplier and retailer supply chain under a returns policy

被引:175
作者
Choi, Tsan-Ming [1 ]
Li, Duan
Yan, Houmin
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Inst Text & Clothing, Business Div, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
returns policy; mean-variance analysis; supply chain management;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.051
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the literature, most of the supply chain coordinating policies target at improving the supply chain's efficiency in terms of expected cost reduction or expected profit improvement.. However, optimizing the expected performance alone cannot guarantee that the realized performance measure will fall within a small neighborhood of its expected value when the corresponding variance is high. Moreover, it ignores the risk aversion of supply chain members which may affect the achievability of channel coordination. As a result, we carry out in this paper a mean-variance (MV) analysis of supply chains under a returns policy. We first propose an MV formulation for a single supplier single retailer supply chain with a news vendor type of product. The objective of each supply chain decision maker is to maximize the expected profit such that the standard deviation of profit is under the decision maker's control. We study both the cases with centralized and decentralized supply chains. We illustrate how a returns policy can be applied for managing the supply chains to address the issues such as channel coordination and risk control. Extensive numerical studies are conducted and managerial findings are proposed. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 376
页数:21
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Gan XH, 2005, PROD OPER MANAG, V14, P80
[12]   Variance vs downside risk: Is there really that much difference? [J].
Grootveld, H ;
Hallerbach, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 114 (02) :304-319
[13]   The right to return [J].
Kandel, E .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1996, 39 (01) :329-356
[14]   MEAN-VARIANCE VERSUS DIRECT UTILITY MAXIMIZATION [J].
KROLL, Y ;
LEVY, H ;
MARKOWITZ, HM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1984, 39 (01) :47-61
[15]  
Lariviere M.A., 1999, Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, P233, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9, 10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-98]
[16]  
Lau AHL, 2000, INT J PROD ECON, V66, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00084-5
[18]   Manufacturer's pricing strategy and return policy for a single-period commodity [J].
Lau, HS ;
Lau, AHL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 116 (02) :291-304
[19]   Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect [J].
Lee, HL ;
Padmanabhan, V ;
Whang, SJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (04) :546-558
[20]  
LEVY H, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P308