Quality costs and robustness criteria in chemical process design optimization

被引:50
作者
Bernardo, FP
Pistikopoulos, EN [1 ]
Saraiva, PM
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, Dept Chem Engn, London SW7 2BY, England
[2] Univ Coimbra, Dept Chem Engn, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
robust design; uncertainty; quality engineering; stochastic optimization;
D O I
10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00630-X
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The identification and incorporation of quality costs and robustness criteria is becoming a critical issue while addressing chemical process design problems under uncertainty. This article presents a systematic design framework that includes Taguchi loss functions and other robustness criteria within a single-level stochastic optimization formulation, with expected values in the presence of uncertainty being estimated by an efficient cubature technique. The solution obtained defines an optimal design, together with a robust operating policy that maximizes average process performance. Two process engineering examples (synthesis and design of a separation system and design of a reactor and heat exchanger plant) illustrate the potential of the proposed design framework. Different quality cost models and robustness criteria are considered, and their influence in the nature and location of best designs systematically studied. This analysis reinforces the need for carefully considering/addressing process quality and robustness related criteria while performing chemical process plant design. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 40
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A parametric MINLP algorithm for process synthesis problems under uncertainty [J].
Acevedo, J ;
Pistikopoulos, EN .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1996, 35 (01) :147-158
[2]   A multiparametric programming approach for linear process engineering problems under uncertainty [J].
Acevedo, J ;
Pistikopoulos, EN .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1997, 36 (03) :717-728
[3]   Robust process planning under uncertainty [J].
Ahmed, S ;
Sahinidis, NV .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1998, 37 (05) :1883-1892
[4]   Integration and computational issues in stochastic design and planning optimization problems [J].
Bernardo, FP ;
Pistikopoulos, EN ;
Saraiva, PM .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1999, 38 (08) :3056-3068
[5]   Robust optimization framework for process parameter and tolerance design [J].
Bernardo, FP ;
Saraiva, PM .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (09) :2007-2017
[6]   Dynamic optimization for batch design and scheduling with process model uncertainty [J].
Bhatia, TK ;
Biegler, LT .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1997, 36 (09) :3708-3717
[7]  
Brooke A., 1992, GAMS A User's Guide. Release 2.25
[8]   Integration of flexibility and control in process design [J].
ChaconMondragon, OL ;
Himmelblau, DM .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 20 (04) :447-452
[9]  
DAVIS PJ, 1975, METHODS NUMERICAL IN
[10]   Efficient sampling technique for optimization under uncertainty [J].
Diwekar, UM ;
Kalagnanam, JR .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1997, 43 (02) :440-447