The naive intuitive statistician:: a naive sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals

被引:110
作者
Juslin, Peter [1 ]
Winman, Anders
Hansson, Patrik
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Psychol, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
subjective probability; calibration; confidence intervals; overconfidence; sampling model;
D O I
10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.678
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The perspective of the naive intuitive statistician is outlined and applied to explain overconfidence when people produce intuitive confidence intervals and why this format leads to more overconfidence than other formally equivalent formats. The naive sampling model implies that people accurately describe the sample information they have but are naive in the sense that they uncritically take sample properties as estimates of population properties. A review demonstrates that the naive sampling model accounts for the robust and important findings in previous research as well as provides novel predictions that are confirmed, including a way to minimize the overconfidence with interval production. The authors discuss the naive sampling model as a representative of models inspired by the naive intuitive statistician.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 703
页数:26
相关论文
共 88 条
[41]  
2-4
[43]   Calibration, additivity, and source independence of probability judgments in general knowledge and sensory discrimination tasks [J].
Juslin, P ;
Winman, A ;
Olsson, H .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 92 (1-2) :34-51
[44]   PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): a "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge [J].
Juslin, P ;
Persson, M .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (05) :563-607
[45]   Format dependence in subjective probability calibration [J].
Juslin, P ;
Wennerholm, P ;
Olsson, H .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1999, 25 (04) :1038-1052
[46]   Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect [J].
Juslin, P ;
Winman, A ;
Olsson, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2000, 107 (02) :384-396
[47]   A CAPACITY THEORY OF COMPREHENSION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY [J].
JUST, MA ;
CARPENTER, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (01) :122-149
[48]   On the reality of cognitive illusions [J].
Kahneman, D ;
Tversky, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 103 (03) :582-591
[49]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[50]  
Kahneman D., 1981, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY, P201, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477