The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies

被引:127
作者
Brockner, J
Heuer, L
Siegel, PA
Wiesenfeld, B
Martin, C
Grover, S
Reed, T
Bjorgvinsson, S
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ Barnard Coll, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Fac Management, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[4] New York Univ, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Management, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[6] Georgia State Univ, Dept Management, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[7] Univ Ulster, Ulster Business Sch, Ulster, North Ireland
[8] New York Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.394
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been posited that high self-esteem persons (high SEs) are more confident than low self-esteem persons (low SEs) of their capability to provide meaningful input in a decision process. If this is so, then high SEs should be more influenced by their perceived level of voice, relative to low SEs. Survey data from 4 field studies showed that voice was more positively related to various dependent variables among high SEs than low SEs. In Study 5, the authors experimentally manipulated voice as well as participants' beliefs about their capability to provide meaningful input. As expected, voice had a greater impact on the reactions of participants who were led to believe that they were more capable of providing meaningful input. Theoretical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 407
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]  
RAHIM MA, 1983, ACAD MANAGE J, V26, P368, DOI 10.5465/255985
[43]  
Rosenberg M., 1965, SOC ADOLESCENT SELF, DOI [10.1515/9781400876136, DOI 10.1515/9781400876136]
[44]   Divergent effects of job control on coping with work stressors: The key role of self-efficacy [J].
Schaubroeck, J ;
Merritt, DE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (03) :738-754
[45]   PROCEDURAL JUSTICE EXPLANATIONS AND EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO ECONOMIC HARDSHIP - A FIELD EXPERIMENT [J].
SCHAUBROECK, J ;
MAY, DR ;
BROWN, FW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (03) :455-460
[46]   COMPARING 3 PROCESSES UNDERLYING JUDGMENTS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE - A FIELD-STUDY OF MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION [J].
SHAPIRO, DL ;
BRETT, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (06) :1167-1177
[47]  
Thibaut J., 1975, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE P
[48]  
Tyler T.R., 1990, APPL SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P77, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315728377-4
[49]   IDEOLOGY AND THE INTERPRETATION OF PERSONAL-EXPERIENCE - PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND POLITICAL QUIESCENCE [J].
TYLER, TR ;
MCGRAW, KM .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1986, 42 (02) :115-128
[50]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE - A TEST OF THE GROUP-VALUE MODEL [J].
TYLER, TR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (05) :830-838