A political-economy theory of trade agreements

被引:138
作者
Maggi, Giovanni
Rodriguez-Clare, Andris
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Econ, University Pk, PA 16801 USA
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1257/aer.97.4.1374
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present a model where trade agreements are motivated by the desire of governments to commit vis-a-vis domestic lobbies, in addition to standard terms-of-trade externalities. The model predicts that trade liberalization is deeper when capital is more mobile across sectors, and when governments are more politically motivated (provided domestic-commitment motives are strong enough). The model also provides a new rationale for the use of tariff ceilings. In a fully dynamic specification of the model, tariffs are reduced in two stages: an immediate cut and a subsequent gradual reduction, with the speed of liberalization increasing in the degree of capital mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1406
页数:33
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
MAGGI, 2006, UNPUB IMPORT TARIFFS
[22]   The role of multilateral institutions in international trade cooperation [J].
Maggi, G .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (01) :190-214
[23]   The value of trade agreements in the presence of political pressures [J].
Maggi, G ;
Rodriguez-Clare, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (03) :574-601
[24]   THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON NEGOTIATED TARIFF ADJUSTMENTS [J].
MAYER, W .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1981, 33 (01) :135-153
[25]   Endogenous political organization and the value of trade agreements [J].
Mitra, D .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 57 (02) :473-485
[26]  
MUSSA ML, 1986, EC LIBERALIZATION DE, P33
[27]   Rent destruction and the political viability of free trade agreements [J].
Ornelas, E .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (04) :1475-1506
[28]  
SALAS, 2004, UNPUB NAFTA TOOL PRE
[29]  
STAIGER RW, 1987, AM ECON REV, V77, P823
[30]  
Staiger RW, 1995, NEW DIRECTIONS IN TRADE THEORY, P249