Layers of co-existing innovation systems

被引:88
作者
Meuer, Johannes [1 ]
Rupietta, Christian [1 ]
Backes-Gellner, Uschi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Business Adm, Plattenstr 14, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Innovation systems; Technological and organisational innovation; Firms' learning behavior; Institutional frameworks; fsQCA; SUR model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; DYNAMICS; ORIGINS; MODES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The innovation systems approach, which has taken a prominent position in the academic literature, has also influenced policy-makers around the globe. Most research analyses innovation systems taking a national, regional or sectoral perspective, following a 'technological imperative'. Yet changes in institutional conditions and the importance of non-technological innovation question the accuracy and the relevance of the existing boundaries of innovation systems. These developments ask for a better understanding of how innovation systems integrate within and across different levels. Drawing on a novel combination of configurational and econometric analysis, we analyse 384 Swiss firms and identify five co-existing innovation systems: two generic innovation systems, the autarkic and the knowledge-internalisation; one regional innovation system, the protected hierarchy; and two sectoral innovation systems, the public sciences and the organised learning. The generic innovation systems entail the 'Science, Technology and Innovation' (STI) and the 'Doing, Interacting and Using' (DUI) learning modes. These systems are structurally distinct and do not integrate. In contrast, all regional and sectoral innovation systems integrate the learning modes of the generic innovation systems and complement them with idiosyncratic elements. The perspective on co-existing innovation systems that we develop here indicates the existence of two layers of innovation systems: a 'central' layer that hosts generic innovation systems and that constitutes the foundation for a second 'surface' layer that hosts regional and sectoral innovation systems. We discuss the implications of layers of co-existing innovation systems for policy-makers and future research. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 910
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   THE GOVERNANCE OF INNOVATION - VERTICAL INTEGRATION AND COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENTS IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY [J].
PISANO, GP .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :237-249
[42]   The skill bias effect of technological and organisational change: Evidence and policy implications [J].
Piva, M ;
Santarelli, E ;
Vivarelli, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (02) :141-157
[43]  
Ragin C. C., 2009, REDESIGNING SOCIAL I
[44]   THE ORIGINS AND DYNAMICS OF PRODUCTION NETWORKS IN SILICON VALLEY [J].
SAXENIAN, AL .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (05) :423-437
[45]   Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept [J].
Sharif, Naubahar .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (05) :745-766
[46]   Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions [J].
Sleuwaegen, Leo ;
Boiardi, Priscilla .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (09) :1508-1522
[47]   Dynamics in innovation systems: Evidence from Japan's game software industry [J].
Storz, Cornelia .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (09) :1480-1491
[48]   The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms [J].
Tether, Bruce S. ;
Tajar, Abdelouahid .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (04) :720-739
[49]   One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach [J].
Tödtling, F ;
Trippl, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1203-1219
[50]   Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research [J].
Walsh, John P. ;
Cohen, Wesley M. ;
Cho, Charlene .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (08) :1184-1203